RUSH: No, I don’t think that’s what is being said because if it’s a case they wanted to take, they would take it. You know, a friend of mine sent me a note after the Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas case. And the note is, “Supreme Court just said that a state that cheats in a national election, which screws everybody in the nation, is the only entity that’s allowed to do anything about it? It’s asinine. It’s like saying the only person who can prosecute a murder is the murderer.”
His point is the Supreme Court said we cannot allow one state to start suing other states because it would soon be out of control and so forth. I think there’s a common denominator in all this that people — I mean you know this, but you may not have put it in your equation. This is strictly about getting rid of Donald Trump. There isn’t an entity in the American deep state, Washington establishment, whatever, that doesn’t want to get rid of Donald Trump, including enough justices on the Supreme Court.
I think there’s some additional reasons why and the court gave its reasons, but the bottom line is that this is the best chance they’ve ever had to get rid of Trump and they’re not gonna hear these cases. They want him gone. It’s no more — in my humble estimation — no more complicated than that. The precedents that are being set, precedents are made to be broken. Supreme Court can break any precedent it wants any time it wants down the line, depending on if they get a case that they want to hear, if they get a case that they want to decide.
I am sure many are upset that Trump nuked big pharma business scams
remember the republican that became independent and voted to impeach? He had business with chinese manufacturers which Trump heavily hit the day before his hissy fit
What reason do we have for believing this? The Texas case was a political flare to get the battle lines drawn. This can be done another way, so why not let it?
No precedent fuckery or anything.
Maybe they are compromised but we're halfway through, I want to reserve judgement on them and not jump to "OMG Deep State" or "Traitor" for anyone who doesn't follow the party line totally.
I remember reading somewhere that Kavanaugh and somebody else were on Romney's short list of potential SCOTUS picks in 2012, so take that for what it's worth.
His point is the Supreme Court said we cannot allow one state to start suing other states because it would soon be out of control and so forth. I think there’s a common denominator in all this that people — I mean you know this, but you may not have put it in your equation. This is strictly about getting rid of Donald Trump. There isn’t an entity in the American deep state, Washington establishment, whatever, that doesn’t want to get rid of Donald Trump, including enough justices on the Supreme Court.
I think there’s some additional reasons why and the court gave its reasons, but the bottom line is that this is the best chance they’ve ever had to get rid of Trump and they’re not gonna hear these cases. They want him gone. It’s no more — in my humble estimation — no more complicated than that. The precedents that are being set, precedents are made to be broken. Supreme Court can break any precedent it wants any time it wants down the line, depending on if they get a case that they want to hear, if they get a case that they want to decide.
95% of republican voters, not politicians
I am sure many are upset that Trump nuked big pharma business scams
remember the republican that became independent and voted to impeach? He had business with chinese manufacturers which Trump heavily hit the day before his hissy fit
I think all this banter is a ruse to mask what is coming. If everyone believes his own party has abandoned him, they will leave their guard down.
and...BOOM.
Why though?
What reason do we have for believing this? The Texas case was a political flare to get the battle lines drawn. This can be done another way, so why not let it?
No precedent fuckery or anything.
Maybe they are compromised but we're halfway through, I want to reserve judgement on them and not jump to "OMG Deep State" or "Traitor" for anyone who doesn't follow the party line totally.
I remember reading somewhere that Kavanaugh and somebody else were on Romney's short list of potential SCOTUS picks in 2012, so take that for what it's worth.