4721
Comments (346)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
318
Vox_Dobad 318 points ago +325 / -7

Levin has pointed out that the AG can say very little about ongoing investigations without committing felony obstruction of justice.

25
Diezelnut 25 points ago +25 / -0

I'm throwing the BULLSHIT flag here. When someone commits a crime, there is no reason to keep the evidence secret. By law, the evidence must be shared with the accused, and the information belongs to the public. Go to a local convenience store. Pick up a copy of "Busted".

There is no problem disseminating evidence against Roger Stone, or the Texas AG.

These "prosecutors" are paid to do a job. When they have evidence of a crime, their job is to prosecute.If we need a special prosecutor every time, fire these useless MF'ers. Further, Justice does not follow politics. If anything the reverse is true. Remember, lady justice is blindfolded. As a result of these corrupt methods, a criminal ran for the highest office. Barr directly enabled that.

Now, we have direct evidence of crimes committed during an election. No prosecutions. No court will even allow evidence to be heard

-3
wethepepe -3 points ago +3 / -6

So, uh, what’s roger stone up to right now? Is he still in jail?

No?

Oh. Ok. Maybe there’s something to the “let’s do it right and locked in” line of thinking

10
Diezelnut 10 points ago +10 / -0

WTF are you talking about ??

Roger Stone was found guilty in Berman Jackson's kangaroo court that wouldn't allow evidence that the entire "Russian election hack" was a fabrication of the intelligence community