I'm amazed some staffer didn't inject for Senators to ask this tard why the tabulators have USB ports with no authentication or authorization enforced.
Therefore, no logging on who made changes.
If he knew databases on the Dominion servers are not encrypted at rest. Nor are the db change logs.
If he knew tabulators and servers are connected to the internet.
If he knew dominion employees ran elections in several key precincts since election workers lacked training.
If he knew Dominion provided on-line remote support to server machines.
If he knew error settings on the machines were set so high as to force adjudication on a mass scale.
And so much more.
Unless he's traced through the actual source code or disassembly of the software, he cannot say with any reasonable certainty what the errors in the log actually mean. It's quite possible that the error message in question can be triggered by numerous different conditions. Anyone working at Microsoft with a law degree in Washington DC should not be considered an expert in software development.
This is what I want!!! I’d bet money that even if it’s native code (however I’m thinking it’s all .NET), I don’t think they’d be smart enough to obfuscate!
All I needed to see was microsoft. He's unqualified in a fundamentally flawed kind of way.
Case closed.
I like the word asshat. Yeah, they kind of lie a lot. Well said.
I am more of an expert at C# than Krebs.
I'm amazed some staffer didn't inject for Senators to ask this tard why the tabulators have USB ports with no authentication or authorization enforced. Therefore, no logging on who made changes. If he knew databases on the Dominion servers are not encrypted at rest. Nor are the db change logs. If he knew tabulators and servers are connected to the internet. If he knew dominion employees ran elections in several key precincts since election workers lacked training. If he knew Dominion provided on-line remote support to server machines. If he knew error settings on the machines were set so high as to force adjudication on a mass scale. And so much more.
Sen Hawley ripped him a new one. Well deserved.
I really hope he never gets corrupted!
Unless he's traced through the actual source code or disassembly of the software, he cannot say with any reasonable certainty what the errors in the log actually mean. It's quite possible that the error message in question can be triggered by numerous different conditions. Anyone working at Microsoft with a law degree in Washington DC should not be considered an expert in software development.
This is what I want!!! I’d bet money that even if it’s native code (however I’m thinking it’s all .NET), I don’t think they’d be smart enough to obfuscate!
I also have doubts that they obfuscated it. I bet that it is all written in .NET. I'd love to get my hands on those assemblies!
Environmental sciences explains everything
Unqualified asshat, spouting asshattery.
What?.... ./sigh And here I am bustin my but as a CyberSec Anon...
He has an insatiable ego.