1704
Comments (109)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
scyenceFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

One other thing... the ultra-rich have been dealing art amongst themselves for some time now, as a tax-avoidance or money laundering scheme.

Think paying off someone with $56K, getting a $10 repro print from posters.com in return, then writing it off the value of the legitimate painting as a business expense- office furniture. When 'the man' comes down on you, you plead ignorance that you didn't know it was a fake.

Overpaying for junk is not illegal.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's mostly real art that's being used that way. It's easy to move around, give as a gift, take out of the country and sell to avoid taxes in one's own country, etc. Same with high-end jewelry.

1
scyenceFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

True dat, as well.