YEP. They need us to "shoot first", so to speak, to reinforce their programming that we are the violent ones. It is a lot easier to get them to fight if they believe they are in immediate danger.
And while organizing in a walmart is harder, it is not impossible.
Probably. We have so many laws on so many different levels these days that just about everything we do daily violates some law or regulation. And there are definitely a lot of laws and regulations surrounding the forming of formal organizations of any kind, more so when those organizations involve our Constitutional rights.
Communists are not fans of organizations, other than their own.
the only people who want to fight wars are glowies, that goes all the way up to Bolton.
To extend your point though, remember when Obama's AG (who some thought might be nominated for SCOTUS) went on TV calling for blood in the streets.
Jesus, if Trump went on TV and non-ironically said the exact same words, I firmly believe a massive chunk of the 80+ million supporters will do just that. Trump makes the call.
I think they would kill off him and his family. Maybe not immediately (they would prosecute and such publicly), but I think "accidents" might start to happen.
the floor is a half million. Reasonable first day is 1 million. End of day 1 might near the 2 you suggest, but those numbers would be useless.
The military has done repeated studies saying that if a civil war broke out, a third to a half of the military are immediately AWOL, regardless of military orders and will generally side with restoring peace rather than any ideology.
Trump has set it up such that one side is burning buildings and wrecking cities while the other us trying to remain calm. Vast majority of that 500k would side with Trump. The people that stay in may end up refusing orders claiming illegality one way or another.
Out of 300 million population, probably about 300k probably show up just because they see a green light to be violent (mind you that's 3000-5000 each in cites cities).
Then you've got millions of gun owners who probably aren't looking to be violent, but have been pushed far enough that any act of perceived aggression would be dealt with immediately with violence. We saw incredible restraint in saint louis when they pointed guns but didn't pull the trigger. That restraint would be gone.
Then you've got rural vs city police forces. let's say 250k of the police forces to the number here to indicate that they'd either be passive to Trump's cause or outright onboard.
If this played out in a way where the Trump had overwhelming success in the 24-48 hours, then comes the red-wave. He's always communicated well with the silent majority compared to BLM/antifa/NFAC probably represents realistic maximum of the paramilitary left.
The problem is always "getting the first wave off the boat" and the left has a near exclusive hold on those with nothing to lose.
YEP. They need us to "shoot first", so to speak, to reinforce their programming that we are the violent ones. It is a lot easier to get them to fight if they believe they are in immediate danger.
And while organizing in a walmart is harder, it is not impossible.
It absolutely matters. This is why organizing happens offline, at least if you are not a sanctioned agitprop type group like BLM or antifa.
That why we only talk about killing commies in Minecraft.
Probably. We have so many laws on so many different levels these days that just about everything we do daily violates some law or regulation. And there are definitely a lot of laws and regulations surrounding the forming of formal organizations of any kind, more so when those organizations involve our Constitutional rights.
Communists are not fans of organizations, other than their own.
the only people who want to fight wars are glowies, that goes all the way up to Bolton.
To extend your point though, remember when Obama's AG (who some thought might be nominated for SCOTUS) went on TV calling for blood in the streets.
Jesus, if Trump went on TV and non-ironically said the exact same words, I firmly believe a massive chunk of the 80+ million supporters will do just that. Trump makes the call.
Nothing we bullshit to eachother matters.
I think they would kill off him and his family. Maybe not immediately (they would prosecute and such publicly), but I think "accidents" might start to happen.
Well things are fairly messed up at this point. We are in deep shit.
This. Get prepared, stand back and stand by. Trump is ten steps ahead. He’s the coach he makes the call. It’s NEVER too late.
the floor is a half million. Reasonable first day is 1 million. End of day 1 might near the 2 you suggest, but those numbers would be useless.
The military has done repeated studies saying that if a civil war broke out, a third to a half of the military are immediately AWOL, regardless of military orders and will generally side with restoring peace rather than any ideology.
Trump has set it up such that one side is burning buildings and wrecking cities while the other us trying to remain calm. Vast majority of that 500k would side with Trump. The people that stay in may end up refusing orders claiming illegality one way or another.
Out of 300 million population, probably about 300k probably show up just because they see a green light to be violent (mind you that's 3000-5000 each in cites cities).
Then you've got millions of gun owners who probably aren't looking to be violent, but have been pushed far enough that any act of perceived aggression would be dealt with immediately with violence. We saw incredible restraint in saint louis when they pointed guns but didn't pull the trigger. That restraint would be gone.
Then you've got rural vs city police forces. let's say 250k of the police forces to the number here to indicate that they'd either be passive to Trump's cause or outright onboard.
If this played out in a way where the Trump had overwhelming success in the 24-48 hours, then comes the red-wave. He's always communicated well with the silent majority compared to BLM/antifa/NFAC probably represents realistic maximum of the paramilitary left.
The problem is always "getting the first wave off the boat" and the left has a near exclusive hold on those with nothing to lose.
An excellent analysis. Thank you for spelling this out.
and pushing out the date further and further
I completely disagree. I believe they WANT to cause that division.
My enemies enemy is my friend kind of thing. Let the people you're trying to control kill each other THEN step in and gain control after the chaos.
Lol, no. They're not.