I appreciate that at Nuremberg, the judges banged the gavel and right then & there, the evildoers were marched outside in their suits and uniforms, and had judgment swiftly rendered upon them.
Many german military personnel were tortured days on and out to obtain admissions of guilt . This shit was a shameful sham from the then rising NWO bois
LOL ! Their cowardice is plenty rewarded. Antifa has promised not to beat the shit out of them, thanks to their recent decisions in favor of election fraud.
"By the longstanding legal doctrine of "Rinse and Repeat" the Court declares this suit null and void. We have ignored so much other fraud that the precedent we set obligates us to dismiss the suit..."
The no standing precedence was set firmly in 2008 for all the eligibility suits. I've been saying it for weeks now. Trump has standing. Voters and electors won't.
We The People have had enough of The Court's malfeasance and that obligates us to act in a manner that the Court will not approve of but we're not listening to the Court anymore. gun go brrrrrrrt
What are they actually asking the Supreme Court though? you can't just go to the Supreme Court with a bunch of proof of fraud... That's not how the Supreme Court works. You have to have a very specific constitutional question that was not able to be resolved in the lower courts and it has to have harmed the filing party....
You can't ask them to decide an election... you can't ask them to make sweeping decisions... you can't ask them to do anything like that... all they can do is answer straightforward constitutionality questions...
The constitutional question was whether or not FL had to stop counting ballots by the safe harbor deadline. That is a constitutional question as the deadline is directly associated with the Electoral College provisions laid out in the Constitution.
Safe Harbor is directly related to the Electoral College and its date that they vote and the date the votes are counted. The Constitution grants the Congress the power to set those dates. Therefore, the power granted by the Constitution to Congress to set those dates are a matter of debate between the federal government and the states.
Florida asked SCOTUS to declare if they should continue counting or not based on those protocols. It is a constitutional matter, and as such that’s why they ruled on it in Bush v. Gore.
My understanding of the Gore SCOTUS case is dem counties were working hard to make any kind of dimpled or non punched out 'chad' count as if it were punched through signifying a vote, all the other counties were following the state's law that they had to be completely punched out, and so it was a constitutional question of equal protection under the law with people in some counties having flubbed attempts to vote count, and others not having their count. The repeated tries to count and count again were stopped because SCOTUS said you've counted everything valid and the repeats are to salvage botched tries which is unfair.
There was absolutely an equal protection side to the decision. However, it focused on the fact that there wasn’t a unified way of counting the under votes. And since there wasn’t enough time to develop a system that would be equally as fair before the safe harbor deadline, the court had to shut the recount down.
No..... you just don't seem to understand what that case was actually about then.... because at its core was still a simple constitutionality question.... The way every single case ever brought before SCOTUS is.....
The Republican State legislatures have already made it clear that they are in favor of Democrat Party election fraud - since they chose Biden electors, right ?
What does it even matter at this point. Even if SCOTUS does rule in our favour, which is unlikely, we'd still have to rely on swamp politicians to overturn the vote. I'm sorry but it's hard to get excited about this stuff at all right now. Trump needs to deputize his support and invoke martial law. Screw the consequences.
Nice to see this! I'm Pro-Powell, but the typos are really frustrating. "ELEMENTH" / "ERREONEOUSLY" etc. Regardless, this is a smart approach by suing Benson and others on behalf of the GOP Electors. If the SCOTUS says THEY don't have standing, then basically no one does.
yeah, if this gets rejected I do believe Trump will finally pull the trigger. He can either wait until after Xmas, but I prefer he does it now, would be a good Xmas present to have military tribunals for these criminals that have brought the country to the precipice. Either we have justice, or we do not have a country.
I believe that 5 of them DO faithfully honor the constitution to the best of their abilities.
That said, if SCOTUS determines there is no constitutional way to undo a rigged and stolen election by blatantly corrupt treasonous individuals, then what good is the constitution?
Ok.. SCOTUS now has cover against people calling them bias. They didn't bite at the first two cases. If the 3 trump judges blow this off, you know they are comprised. Something far bigger is at play here.
"VI. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT FOUND
THAT THE PETITIONERS FAILED TO SHOW THAT THEIR INJURY CAN
BE REDRESSED BY THE RELIEF SOUGHT AND HELD THAT THE
PETITIONERS POSSESS NO STANDING TO PURSUE THEIR EQUAL
PROTECTION CLAIM WHEN GIVEN THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AND
THE RELIEF SOUGHT, THE ISSUE OF VOTER FRAUD AND
VALIDATION OF ELECTION IS THE VERY RELIEF THAT A COURT CAN
REDRESS PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE
PETITIONERS CLEARLY HAVE STANDING?"
So who the fuck would have standing and not get subject to the bullshit legal cowardice know as laches? Supreme Court is creating a huge black hole in the constitutional order after dismissing Texas et al.
Pretty sure her evidence will have plenty of standing under Martial Law though
Military Tribunals are more fun than Supreme Court verdicts anyway!
I appreciate that at Nuremberg, the judges banged the gavel and right then & there, the evildoers were marched outside in their suits and uniforms, and had judgment swiftly rendered upon them.
That would set the right tone. And serve as a reminder for anyone that ever thought of stealing an election in the future.
Courts/Judges, fix this so there's no war.
They better fix it.
If they don't I fully support a civil war.
We need to start calling it The Rededication.
Confirmation of Rights.
Too bad we don't have the caliber of judges these days
I read in a magazine that enough evidence triggers a new ball game.
Guns.
Nuremberg trials were a fucking joke. They declared that and I quote "the tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof " (page 10 article 21 https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.2_Charter%20of%20IMT%201945.pdf)
Many german military personnel were tortured days on and out to obtain admissions of guilt . This shit was a shameful sham from the then rising NWO bois
Learning new things. Well, we’ve got some work to do for TRUE justice.
Hold on, torture is on the table?
That sounds like a positive to me.
It already is
Well, it doesn't help with the quality of the evidences tho
Do you support Nazi Germany?
There's a group of Nazis here that like to pretend they're with us. They're relatively small, but very vocal. Just deport when you find them.
I’m simply quoting general Patton
What are you talking about. Many were executed years after and some had their sentences reduced.
"We don't need evidence for established facts"
I guess all the evidence these autists gathered wasn't needed
I think they would definitely boast patriotic morale and honestly. The stupid young of today may actually wake up to see what consequences look like.
There won't be military tribunals.
Damn - you were fast- beat me to it !
Maybe those cowards finally realize cowardice won’t be tolerated, and actually did their job.
LOL ! Their cowardice is plenty rewarded. Antifa has promised not to beat the shit out of them, thanks to their recent decisions in favor of election fraud.
Hope they ask forgiveness of GOD ALMIGHTY and do righteousness in his sight. Num 32:13, SCOTUS.
The taxes case was also Docketed. It means nothing.
They'll cuck and punt as expected.
no standing refers to the supreme court's lack of spine. jk. i hope this goes somewhere.
It’s true. No spine makes for no standing. No sitting, either.
SIOTUS? Supreme Invertebrates of the United States?
Underrated comment right here!
Supposedly there are electors in the lawsuit. So they should have standing but who knows.
On this weeks episode of "How cucked is SCOTUS?"
Todays episode: "Very"
"By the longstanding legal doctrine of "Rinse and Repeat" the Court declares this suit null and void. We have ignored so much other fraud that the precedent we set obligates us to dismiss the suit..."
Greeeeat. So “no standing” is now “precedent.” Time to get off this ride.
Jesus is going to do a mighty work in spite of this.
The mighty work he has done is in your heart!
Amen!
The no standing precedence was set firmly in 2008 for all the eligibility suits. I've been saying it for weeks now. Trump has standing. Voters and electors won't.
We The People have had enough of The Court's malfeasance and that obligates us to act in a manner that the Court will not approve of but we're not listening to the Court anymore. gun go brrrrrrrt
I’ll be your huckleberry
SCOTUS is useless.
They are extremely useful to the republican/democrat uniparty.
Republicrat
What are they actually asking the Supreme Court though? you can't just go to the Supreme Court with a bunch of proof of fraud... That's not how the Supreme Court works. You have to have a very specific constitutional question that was not able to be resolved in the lower courts and it has to have harmed the filing party....
You can't ask them to decide an election... you can't ask them to make sweeping decisions... you can't ask them to do anything like that... all they can do is answer straightforward constitutionality questions...
George Bush asked them to stop recounts in 2000. And SCOTUS ordered the stopping of recounts - thus deciding the election.
That kind of refutes your weak argument.
There is nothing about hanging chads in the Constitution.
If you want to bring in stuff about "equal protection of the laws" - well, that was exactly what Texas just claimed - and SCOTUS told them FUCK YOU.
Pretty sure people stopped naming their kids “chad” after that debacle.
Weirdly, Chad became a negative for a long time.
Now it's a positive again.
Shit's weird.
The constitutional question was whether or not FL had to stop counting ballots by the safe harbor deadline. That is a constitutional question as the deadline is directly associated with the Electoral College provisions laid out in the Constitution.
There is no "Safe Harbor" deadline in the Constitution. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Safe Harbor is directly related to the Electoral College and its date that they vote and the date the votes are counted. The Constitution grants the Congress the power to set those dates. Therefore, the power granted by the Constitution to Congress to set those dates are a matter of debate between the federal government and the states.
Florida asked SCOTUS to declare if they should continue counting or not based on those protocols. It is a constitutional matter, and as such that’s why they ruled on it in Bush v. Gore.
My understanding of the Gore SCOTUS case is dem counties were working hard to make any kind of dimpled or non punched out 'chad' count as if it were punched through signifying a vote, all the other counties were following the state's law that they had to be completely punched out, and so it was a constitutional question of equal protection under the law with people in some counties having flubbed attempts to vote count, and others not having their count. The repeated tries to count and count again were stopped because SCOTUS said you've counted everything valid and the repeats are to salvage botched tries which is unfair.
There was absolutely an equal protection side to the decision. However, it focused on the fact that there wasn’t a unified way of counting the under votes. And since there wasn’t enough time to develop a system that would be equally as fair before the safe harbor deadline, the court had to shut the recount down.
Thank you...
It's terrifying how few of our members around here have even the foggiest clue what the Supreme Court does or how they function.....
The difference is, Bush was a well connected member of the Uniparty.
Should be obvious to everyone here by now.
No..... you just don't seem to understand what that case was actually about then.... because at its core was still a simple constitutionality question.... The way every single case ever brought before SCOTUS is.....
good point. lets look up the suit.
equal protection is the constitutional matter. Maybe also disenfranchisement...
SCOTUS is the supreme court in the land and can do pretty much anything they want .. if they wish.
The Republican State legislatures have already made it clear that they are in favor of Democrat Party election fraud - since they chose Biden electors, right ?
What am I missing here ?
The Democrats are lucky - they have a party - we do not.
If there were a Muslim political party in the USA nobody would stuff the ballot boxes against them.
They would just send some guys with AK-47s right into a Democratic club.
They wouldn't have to do it twice.
I have no idea what you are talking about with "Biden actually won".
Sidney Powell is literally a one person wrecking crew along with her team. The work she has put in isn't larp.
Might as well be, hasn’t stopped the deep state one bit
New account but accurate
Laches, too late. So sorry.
Yes, we all love "Laches" from SCOTUS's Greatest Holiday Hits album !
John's nuts resting on an orphan child, Flight logs tipping what he knows...
Giddy-yap giddy-yap giddy-yap let's go
Let's fake votes for Joe
We're riding in a cloud of Hunter's blow
Giddy-yap giddy-yap giddy-yap it's great
Let's tabulate
We're gliding along with the song of a fraudulent swing state !
Snowflakes that reee when no judge will eye laches...
Fake Biden ballots in 4 AM batches
SCOTUS rulings that proclaim "No stand-DING"
These are a few of my least favorite things...
Wreck the laws with blows of folly. Fail law law law law...
Here we go a fossiling the grave of RBG
We'll have a blue congress, without you. Expections of red, under an orange victory...
t's the most fraudulent time of the year
When the states have no standing
Lindsay Graham is grandstanding
He's looking so queer !
It's the most fraudulent time of the year
RBG? lol, I'm picturing RBG with RGB lights on her casket.
🎉🥳 Party lights. 🥳🎉
Spoiler alert: They'll cuck out again.
If they turn it down, we need to gather outside the justices’ houses and the Supreme Court and make their lives miserable every day
Pray for the Supreme Court. I don't care if you think they're going to cuck or not, they probably will. Pray for them.
I believe in positive high energy. Let’s pray pray pray and pray!
Link to SC: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html
The date looks wrong?
Do you have a time machine?
No the date is right. Just nobody reported on it until yesterday.
What does it even matter at this point. Even if SCOTUS does rule in our favour, which is unlikely, we'd still have to rely on swamp politicians to overturn the vote. I'm sorry but it's hard to get excited about this stuff at all right now. Trump needs to deputize his support and invoke martial law. Screw the consequences.
If SCOTUS ruled properly, they could have changed everything.
No doubt about it.
Believe it or not, SCOTUS does have the power to pause election certification and demand recounts and audits. So it actually does matter a lot.
If that's the case then that's good. I hope they grow a pair and start taking their job seriously.
Lucy with the football....
Nice to see this! I'm Pro-Powell, but the typos are really frustrating. "ELEMENTH" / "ERREONEOUSLY" etc. Regardless, this is a smart approach by suing Benson and others on behalf of the GOP Electors. If the SCOTUS says THEY don't have standing, then basically no one does.
14th... Lin Wood’s the 11th. Seems very far away. And then how much time to review the response?
yeah, if this gets rejected I do believe Trump will finally pull the trigger. He can either wait until after Xmas, but I prefer he does it now, would be a good Xmas present to have military tribunals for these criminals that have brought the country to the precipice. Either we have justice, or we do not have a country.
Oh my oh my oh my. Either it’s nothing’s going right or EVERY SINGLE THING is going the right way!
Maybe Sydney Powell should revoke her citizenship and submit the complaint in Spanish...then she would defiantly have standing.
So is this the final shot they get before the bring in the military? because i want the military.
They dont have time for this. They're far too busy telling states that you can't require citizenship to be eligible to vote.
I trust some of the SCOTUS members.
I believe that 5 of them DO faithfully honor the constitution to the best of their abilities.
That said, if SCOTUS determines there is no constitutional way to undo a rigged and stolen election by blatantly corrupt treasonous individuals, then what good is the constitution?
Annnnnnnd nothing will happen in 5...4....
We need Trump to invoke the special prosecutor clause to get unlimited subpoena power and actually get quick movement on things. Enough is enough.
nO sTaNdInG!!!1!!1111
Too late ! Laches on YOU ! That comment was already made.
S T A N D I N G
Ok.. SCOTUS now has cover against people calling them bias. They didn't bite at the first two cases. If the 3 trump judges blow this off, you know they are comprised. Something far bigger is at play here.
As long as you aren't asking us to explain it to you like you are in Kindergarten.
"VI. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT FOUND THAT THE PETITIONERS FAILED TO SHOW THAT THEIR INJURY CAN BE REDRESSED BY THE RELIEF SOUGHT AND HELD THAT THE PETITIONERS POSSESS NO STANDING TO PURSUE THEIR EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM WHEN GIVEN THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AND THE RELIEF SOUGHT, THE ISSUE OF VOTER FRAUD AND VALIDATION OF ELECTION IS THE VERY RELIEF THAT A COURT CAN REDRESS PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE PETITIONERS CLEARLY HAVE STANDING?"
Want to bet?
Hawaiian judge declares he is a SCOTUS judge and says it's unconstitutional. Sorry, guys, we need to take the L on this one...
Powell and wood have yet to literally give any evidence of anything. They tweet every 30 minutes but that’s about it
Let me guess. No standing, or shoulda sued back in 2009
In before Supreme Faggots dismiss.
So who the fuck would have standing and not get subject to the bullshit legal cowardice know as laches? Supreme Court is creating a huge black hole in the constitutional order after dismissing Texas et al.
sounds like it's time for a purview.
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4bzk33n/-happening-sidney-powell-release/c/
June 2021
Ugh... The formatting looks so unprofessional. Not following the SCOTUS’s font / margin / line-spacing rules. It does not instill confidence.
Case dismissed, 2-7 sorry.
They'll issue a motion to dismiss on the grounds that MI being overturned wouldn't change the overall result. I'd bet on it.
If the SC wants to be a bunch of hacks we'll see it then.
Amazing