68% fail rate... I don't know any type of business area where that is truly an acceptable rate of failure. Definitely would fall under retract, access/restructure, and try again...then fire whoever allowed that large of a fail rate.
It could be misleading. My first thought is 68% of ballots are incorrectly counted. That's wrong iirc - isn't it 68% cause errors in the system, requiring further (unsupervised) investigation?
Like yea, it could be misleading, but FB is using this as a tool to decry the evidence as fake or insignificant. Awful.
Yes, I will believe the accomplices to the bank robbery telling me that the bank wasn't robbed.
Lmao "well the people accused of improper adjudication say they didn't do that...."
The same ones that destroyed the records
It is misleading. It was actually a 68.05% error rate. /Snopes
The computer can't read a simple ballot form all of a sudden but they had no problem matching 99.98% of signatures
68% fail rate... I don't know any type of business area where that is truly an acceptable rate of failure. Definitely would fall under retract, access/restructure, and try again...then fire whoever allowed that large of a fail rate.
"Fact checkers" are missleading
If done correctly 68% of the lefties will believe in it.
Our guy won so it's, like, totally normal.
~flip the script~
REEEEE RUSSIA SToled teh Eluction!!!! REEEEE AUDIT NOW!!! ;p
It could be misleading. My first thought is 68% of ballots are incorrectly counted. That's wrong iirc - isn't it 68% cause errors in the system, requiring further (unsupervised) investigation?
Like yea, it could be misleading, but FB is using this as a tool to decry the evidence as fake or insignificant. Awful.
I love that they don’t even hide their bias anymore.