1296
Comments (44)
sorted by:
77
Tseliteiv 77 points ago +82 / -5

SCOTUS: We find that Powell doesn't have standing.

SCOTUS: We find that the case was brought forward too late and should have been brought forward in 1787 when the constitution was first written because they should have foreseen things back then.

SCOTUS: inset some technicality to not hear the case. GUARANTEED

35
people_who_annoy_you 35 points ago +38 / -3

I have faith SCOTUS will try this case and its merits.

34
RahkeemTheMachine 34 points ago +34 / -0

First day?

19
TheEnclave89 19 points ago +19 / -0

I pray it does. America is a powder keg right now.

14
I_Love_45-70_Gov 14 points ago +14 / -0

And I'm a lit motherfucking match.

A Kitchen Match, because they make for the best matches.

10
TheEnclave89 10 points ago +10 / -0

We're going to win this!

And, yes, kitchen matches are the best matches.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
5
TheEnclave89 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good insight, I agree.

8
johndude 8 points ago +9 / -1

I don't

7
jpower 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think it's 50/50 either way. I don't have a lot of faith in it, but I have more faith Trump will do the right thing

3
carriemcgavock 3 points ago +3 / -0

You and I seem to be the only ones who think so, sadly.

2
LetMeBeFrank 2 points ago +2 / -0

The people: lock and load "We'll show you standing"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
29
Roxel36 29 points ago +29 / -0

Docketed only means they met the criteria to file the case. Texas car was docketed and SC cowered in fear and shot it down

26
Dogpile1 26 points ago +26 / -0

We agree to hear the case. Discovery set for April 3, 2022.

25
M855A1 [S] 25 points ago +26 / -1

April 1*

7
leakmouth 7 points ago +7 / -0

Isn’t that when the Durham report will be released or is that 2023?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
14
RC22 14 points ago +14 / -0

Jan 15th blah

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
RC22 6 points ago +6 / -0

It really is the 15th, just for responses.

4
jpower 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesn't matter anymore. Trump can shut shit down up till January 20.

Let's just hope he still does it before January 6

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
10
LincolnSteffens 10 points ago +10 / -0

So Jan 14th ummmm thats to fucking late.

6
Oneyes 6 points ago +6 / -0

I do not have faith in SCOTUS anymore. And I'm seeing most republicans conceding under their loser attitude that good guys give up without rioting.

There should be violent riots, in minecraft.

5
I_Love_45-70_Gov 5 points ago +5 / -0

SCOTUS?

Aren't they SCROTUS now?

4
MAGAlikethis 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Nor can any mootness defense be entertained when the tally of electors under 3 U.S.C. § 15does not take place until January 6, 2020."

Nice move, Sidney.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-815/163875/20201215164905775_Final%20Michigan%20Notice%20of%20Supplemental%20Authority.pdf

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
STXMO2 9 points ago +9 / -0

Looks like the Michigan one was docketed yesterday. Docket #20-815

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
TheKillingWords 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they refuse to hear the case, I won't hold it against her at all. But if they do and she brings the goods as she's promised, I'll find some crow and eat it.

3
eatcheese 3 points ago +3 / -0

What does January 15th mean?

2
lazercrazy3 2 points ago +2 / -0

If criminals get standing, have a criminal file the case.

2
PresidentErectHunter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sidney is so adorable!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MrQuacker2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry to busy need to rule as to whether chicks with dicks can play boofball in womenz sports.....

1
Skippy737 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe now they are certified she can go to thenSC, but otherwise, the sc wouldmt take the case bc its a state issue, win in thatbstate and change electors, i bet thenSC doesnt get involved. No standing. Bueller, bueller At least they wont give the whole bs laches excuse fuck me onnthat one

1
rjs3455 1 point ago +1 / -0

No standing....oh wait ....Latches....clowns