I'm sure you're close enough to a home depot, and your state capitol can't be more than a few hours away. Buy some 4x4 planks and some hardware and rope and build some decorations on the capitol building's lawn.
I'd love to watch Rand Paul challenge every damn elector that comes from those swing states and make them see the evidence, in open session, over and over and over...
He should do it and force them to listen to it. I think the rule is 2 hour debate. Not sure if that is for each elector or if it (more likely) is for the whole state in one bloc.
It is ambiguous, whether they're to be handled collectively or individually. However, if Pence is feeling picky enough (and I hope he does), he could accept objections to each elector's vote individually.
But since there's a five-minute limit per speaker during those two hours, they'd have to have a team yield their time to one another.
This, of course, assumes that Nazi Pelousy doesn't try to unseat all 126 House supporters of Texas v. Pennsylvania on grounds of "sedition"...
I'm sure you're close enough to a home depot, and your state capitol can't be more than a few hours away. Buy some 4x4 planks and some hardware and rope and build some decorations on the capitol building's lawn.
I'd love to watch Rand Paul challenge every damn elector that comes from those swing states and make them see the evidence, in open session, over and over and over...
And this hearing would justify him doing it.
He should do it and force them to listen to it. I think the rule is 2 hour debate. Not sure if that is for each elector or if it (more likely) is for the whole state in one bloc.
It is ambiguous, whether they're to be handled collectively or individually. However, if Pence is feeling picky enough (and I hope he does), he could accept objections to each elector's vote individually.
But since there's a five-minute limit per speaker during those two hours, they'd have to have a team yield their time to one another.
This, of course, assumes that Nazi Pelousy doesn't try to unseat all 126 House supporters of Texas v. Pennsylvania on grounds of "sedition"...
I really hope she does, unseating over half the R delegation would be enough to guarantee a civil war.
She's welcome to try, but I don't think even the Democrats would be on board with that plan. She's already on thin ice with her speaker slot.
COMMUNIST PELOSI