Right I don’t see why people are immediately dooming like somethings out the window, Ratcliff reported countries definitely interfered, that’s a report, and they’re still compiling more proof. Ok.
I'm trying not to doom but I heard that ratcliff is getting push back on how big the interference was. I think some want to put out a report that down plays it while ratcliff believes China did more or they need to add more to the report.
Jack Posobic explained it on War Room this evening. There's basically a segment of the intel agencies (Jack called them patriots) who want to report that China had a huge roll in election interference. There's another group who want to blame Russia for some stuff (some of the same people behind RussiaGate), and they don't want to include the China part. Radcliff has said to include both parts in the report, because it's policy to include decanting options if they are large enough; but the intel community doesn't seem to want to cooperate. Apparently Radcliff doesn't want to sign off on a report that doesn't include both the China, and Russia info.
I wonder what the game plan is. Because of Ratcliff's statement about not knowing if we're going to have Biden in office. I've wondered if they know that China interfered in the election to help Biden and if they can tie the hunter biden/joe biden scandal together. Would that be enough to make the call Joe is a national security risk or gives Trump the leverage to force a real investigation into all fraud claims?
Reading between the lines that makes it sound like the interference is marginal, wherever it came from. If it said China was changing votes, there would be no debate. Doesn't matter anyways because I don't think Jack is reputable.
‘How big’? The EO says ‘any interference’ .... nowhere in it does it state how big the interference needs to be, so I don’t know what that’s supposed to mean.
Yeah but imo it matters. The EO can say that but if they put out a report that says only China brought some anti trump facebook ads or shared some tweets thats not going to be enough. Trump is hated by the establishment. The media has already tried to paint him as a dictator and they've tried to kill his fraud claims. If trump tries to use the insurrection act over a lackluster report the media will claim this is just the desperate move of a man who doesn't want to lose power. The deep state could finally turn on him in the worst way possible. So he has to be smart. I'm sure he knows this.
Right I don’t see why people are immediately dooming like somethings out the window, Ratcliff reported countries definitely interfered, that’s a report, and they’re still compiling more proof. Ok.
I'm trying not to doom but I heard that ratcliff is getting push back on how big the interference was. I think some want to put out a report that down plays it while ratcliff believes China did more or they need to add more to the report.
Jack Posobic explained it on War Room this evening. There's basically a segment of the intel agencies (Jack called them patriots) who want to report that China had a huge roll in election interference. There's another group who want to blame Russia for some stuff (some of the same people behind RussiaGate), and they don't want to include the China part. Radcliff has said to include both parts in the report, because it's policy to include decanting options if they are large enough; but the intel community doesn't seem to want to cooperate. Apparently Radcliff doesn't want to sign off on a report that doesn't include both the China, and Russia info.
Yup. What generated_name said.
I wonder what the game plan is. Because of Ratcliff's statement about not knowing if we're going to have Biden in office. I've wondered if they know that China interfered in the election to help Biden and if they can tie the hunter biden/joe biden scandal together. Would that be enough to make the call Joe is a national security risk or gives Trump the leverage to force a real investigation into all fraud claims?
Reading between the lines that makes it sound like the interference is marginal, wherever it came from. If it said China was changing votes, there would be no debate. Doesn't matter anyways because I don't think Jack is reputable.
‘How big’? The EO says ‘any interference’ .... nowhere in it does it state how big the interference needs to be, so I don’t know what that’s supposed to mean.
Yeah but imo it matters. The EO can say that but if they put out a report that says only China brought some anti trump facebook ads or shared some tweets thats not going to be enough. Trump is hated by the establishment. The media has already tried to paint him as a dictator and they've tried to kill his fraud claims. If trump tries to use the insurrection act over a lackluster report the media will claim this is just the desperate move of a man who doesn't want to lose power. The deep state could finally turn on him in the worst way possible. So he has to be smart. I'm sure he knows this.
How is the media going to claim anything from their cells in gitmo?