5 The second wave of the Spanish Flu of 1918 was more deadly than the first. So we can surmise that the second wave of the coronavirus may be even deadlier than the first (prepperl1cense.code.blog) posted 120 days ago by yourbro6 120 days ago by yourbro6 +7 / -2 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (4) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 4 ▼ – GreenScreen 4 points 120 days ago +4 / -0 Well what was the count. 6k of deaths with people who had no comorbidities. So.... 12k? Out of 350 million? Forgive me if I don't run screaming through the streets. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Mamapedia 3 points 120 days ago +3 / -0 Well, that was 1918, and the Spanish Flu was real, so, no. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – RustyJShackleford 3 points 120 days ago +3 / -0 I doubt it. Proving to be less than 1/4 as lethal as the first wave where I am. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Tsmumbles 2 points 120 days ago +2 / -0 Does that mean only a 99.2% recovery rate? I’m ok with that. permalink save report block reply
Well what was the count. 6k of deaths with people who had no comorbidities. So.... 12k? Out of 350 million? Forgive me if I don't run screaming through the streets.
Well, that was 1918, and the Spanish Flu was real, so, no.
I doubt it.
Proving to be less than 1/4 as lethal as the first wave where I am.
Does that mean only a 99.2% recovery rate? I’m ok with that.