I think everyone is missing the most important point of why this election was stolen, and how it was different than other elections, and also why massive mail-in voting is bad. And how this election was special and different not only in the united states, but worldwide.

Usually elections are impossible to steal. Why? Because normal elections in normal functioning democracies, each polling place is intentionally small and responsible for a very small number of votes. Every polling worker is responsible for a small number of votes, and even when he is fully compromised, he can only effect a few hundreds of votes, so to steal an election requires compromising tens of thousands of poll workers, an impossible task.

But this election was different. Under the excuse of covid, mail-in voting was introduced. The problem wasn't only that it's easier to cast a fraudulent vote. The problem was that all these votes were counted by very small number of officials. Every official in Detroit, Milwaukee and Philadelphia and Atlanta had access to much more votes than normal. Votes that would usually split in responsibility between thousands of small precincts fell under the sole responsibility of big counting centers in urban areas. Instead of having an election where a compromised election official can effect at 100 ballots, you had an election where a single official was entrusted with tens of thousands of ballots.

This is alone sheds light on a big problem with voting machines. Even perfectly secure voting machines allow a single election official to be be responsible for and entrusted with much more ballots than he otherwise would be, and this is an inherent vulnerability in voting machines.

This also points out to another problem in those places where the counting took too long. It took too long because too few workers were entrusted with too many ballots. They let too few workers handle too many ballots, even when the scale of the work was known in advance, because they want to intentionally have as few people exposed to the fraud as possible.

**The way to regulate around preventing this from happening again, is that you have to put a maximum number of votes a single election worker is entrusted with, and every batch must have a recording of which officials were responsible for it every step of the way, and you need to enforce those hard limits of worker-ballot responsibility. **

It's not enough to verify everything. election integrity responsibility should be dispersed between as many people as possible.

This is such an important point that I don't see anyone pushing. People need to understand that decentralization of counting the votes is the most important security measure in elections, and need to realize the depth of the compromise of that security measure. This is the heart of the fraud. This needs to be explained. It's also what sets apparent this election apart from elections in other democratic countries.

Decentralizing the election to prevent a steal is the equivalent of locking the door. Centralized election is like a house with an open door.

An election which by design is entrusted to a few workers in urban centers is enabling fraud. This election had cities arbitrarily centralizing hundreds of thousands of votes in an unprecedented way, funded by external interests. This is the heart of the fraud. Without centralization of counting and intentionally leaving a single point of failure, fraud can't happen.

Please Please Please spread this point, I can't stress this enough.