5340
Comments (188)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
23
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 23 points ago +24 / -1

I love and support president Donald Trump. However, it was a HUGE mistake for him not to remove their 230 protections by executive order before the election.

19
ZoominLikeToobin 19 points ago +19 / -0

It needs to be amended not repealed. Places like TDW wouldnt be able to exist without it. There are just too many lawyers that like to sue for ridiculous reasons. It should be amended to remove companies based on revenue or international ownership to protect the smaller operations.

4
Trump_in_2020_Pedes 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not sure I follow you...I'm saying their Rule 230 protections should be removed/repealed. The purpose of this is so that they can be sued if they censor posts. If you think they should be protected from lawsuits (assuming they will act like a platform) even though they're censoring posts (and acting as a publisher), I'm not sure I agree with you.

8
ZoominLikeToobin 8 points ago +8 / -0

Section 230 protects more than just Big Tech. It protects a lot of smaller groups such as websites containing message boards like TDW from being sued for the content on the platform. We need to take a page out of the left's playbook and single out big tech to be excluded from 230 protections that's why I suggest revenue for size and international ownership for foreign influence.