"Source" is a 50/50 gamble. Don't discount immediately. Remember, our pal Bongino has "sources" too that he won't expose the names of. A source can be made worthless if their identity is exposed. Or even put in danger.
True, but all familiar with Dan Bogino and his credibility to varying degrees. He's not going to make big risks by providing us with info he can't vet to some degree.
No offense to Ann Vandersteel, but I don't know her. I doubt I'm the only one. I have no reason to trust someone I don't know especially if she's acting as a relay and not the source itself. For all I know she could be espousing non-sense into the wind on the outside chance she's right for some quick credibility. I'm not going to assume that's the case, but it could be. Hopefully she's right, no reason to just believe it from my perspective though.
"Source" is a 50/50 gamble. Don't discount immediately. Remember, our pal Bongino has "sources" too that he won't expose the names of. A source can be made worthless if their identity is exposed. Or even put in danger.
True, but all familiar with Dan Bogino and his credibility to varying degrees. He's not going to make big risks by providing us with info he can't vet to some degree.
No offense to Ann Vandersteel, but I don't know her. I doubt I'm the only one. I have no reason to trust someone I don't know especially if she's acting as a relay and not the source itself. For all I know she could be espousing non-sense into the wind on the outside chance she's right for some quick credibility. I'm not going to assume that's the case, but it could be. Hopefully she's right, no reason to just believe it from my perspective though.
Yeah but it’s also easy to believe sources that you want to believe and discredit the ones you don’t.