105
posted ago by CrackerJack2 ago by CrackerJack2 +105 / -0

Please Review and comment as this could be very important in understanding how this election was seemingly stolen via Dominion software and/or other software programs.

This is the 1st time this has been proposed, I think, so constructive criticism and a through going over is welcomed and encouraged. Thank you.



NY Times feed data seems to point directly to an external or coordinated manipulation of strong Trump Counties votes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and other states.      
This is clearly seen in some of the small counties data that almost always vote for heavily for President Trump.  
This 'Capping', however, did NOT occur in many Biden stronghold Counties such as Wayne County.   Obviously, it seems real proof of a large, coordinated VOTER FRAUD scheme. 
 
The following is just one case of many counties that most likely have been controlled by some software to put an artificial 'Cap' on the Trump votes as counted using the Edison Research/ National Election Pool database.  These pool results are then fed to all the major news outlets, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and NYTimes on election night.     
The 'cap' seems to kick in when the vote in these small Trump Counties exceeds the EEVP, what A.P. ( Associated Press) and now Edison Research call the "Estimated Expected Vote Percentage".       
The eevp is almost certainly a percentage of the registered vote.  
  
The eevp seems most likely around 70% of vote,  for Antrim County, with 22,082 registered voters, and 15,415 votes gives:           15,415÷ 22,082  
      = 0.698 ~ 0.70 = 70%
      
Typical 'capped' Vote County:

Arenac County, Michigan:
(N.Y. Times election results feed)

 Total votes tabulated:  "votes":8830,"
     "eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":8830,"
total expected vote is equal to EEVP.   
  
It is very, very unlikely that the total actual vote would be exactly equal to the EEVP or "tot_exp_vote" (total expected vote), as all of these 8,830 voters, no more, no less, are said to have shown up to vote in Arenac County to vote.

The fact that a number of other counties in Michigan also had the same very, very unlikely occurance makes it an almost complete statistical impossibility!

   (Arenac County Population
Estimate (2018)      15,041 )  
( Arenac County registered voters: 12,220 (as of 8/4/2020) )  
( 8830/12,220=0.7226 (close to 70%))
    ( election results from NYTimes feed      confirmed in newspaper:   (https://www.arenacindependent.com/articles/unofficial-election-results-for-arenac-county-2/) ).

     ( NYTimes feed:)  
{"fips":"26011","name":"Arenac","votes":8830,"absentee_votes":0,"reporting":15,"precincts":15,"absentee_method":"Merged into voters' home precincts and released with cumulative results","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":8830,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":6,"absentee_count_progress":"unknown","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":563,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":2773,"trumpd":5928,"jorgensenj":97,"blankenshipd":17,"hawkinsh":12,"de_la_fuenter":3,"write-ins":0},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":0,"trumpd":0,"jorgensenj":0,"blankenshipd":0,"hawkinsh":0,"de_la_fuenter":0,"write-ins":0},"last_updated":"2020-11-04T17:58:32Z","leader_margin_value":35.73046,"leader_margin_display":"R+36","leader_margin_name_display":"Trump +36","leader_party_id":"republican","margin2020":35.73046,"votes2016":7729,"margin2016":33.2,"votes2012":7841,"margin2012":4.95},

Uncapped Vote in 'Trump' County in Michigan:
Antrim County.
Why?  Because someone actually went back and reviewed the votes by hand, so someone corrected and updated the results AFTER this incident.
This is the famous county in Michigan with the 'glitch'.

Antrim County:
Total Votes recorded: 17347
"eevp"100","tot_exp_vote":15415
( total expected vote)

*******  
(!Antrim updated 2020-11-06T01:56:38Z !) *******   
{"fips":"26009","name":"Antrim","votes":17347,"absentee_votes":0,"reporting":16,"precincts":16,"absentee_method":"Merged into voters' home precincts AFTER election night","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":15415,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":2,"absentee_count_progress":"unknown","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":2188,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":7289,"trumpd":9783,"jorgensenj":197,"hawkinsh":28,"blankenshipd":22,"write-ins":20,"de_la_fuenter":8},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":0,"trumpd":0,"jorgensenj":0,"hawkinsh":0,"blankenshipd":0,"write-ins":0,"de_la_fuenter":0},"last_updated":"2020-11-06T01:56:38Z","leader_margin_value":14.37713,"leader_margin_display":"R+14","leader_margin_name_display":"Trump +14","leader_party_id":"republican","margin2020":14.37713,"votes2016":13667,"margin2016":29.4,"votes2012":13195,"margin2012":21.3},

WAYNE COUNTY

"votes":863382
"absentee_votes":436037
"eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":840000,"
.
There seems to be a Gaming of the vote, as more votes were allowed in Wayne County than the smaller counties:
ex. Clinton, Clare, Crawford, etc., all strong Trump Counties, which were only allowed by a program to reach 100% of expected vote.
.
NY Times election feed:
{"fips":"26163","name":"Wayne","votes":863382,"absentee_votes":436037,"reporting":955,"precincts":1017,"absentee_method":"Released separately AFTER election night","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":840000,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":4,"absentee_count_progress":"unknown","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":172169,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":587074,"trumpd":264149,"jorgensenj":6551,"hawkinsh":2438,"write-ins":1561,"blankenshipd":1073,"de_la_fuenter":536},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":325787,"trumpd":105517,"jorgensenj":2567,"hawkinsh":989,"write-ins":502,"blankenshipd":464,"de_la_fuenter":211},"last_updated":"2020-11-05T13:34:42Z","leader_margin_value":37.40233,"leader_margin_display":"D+37","leader_margin_name_display":"Biden +37","leader_party_id":"democrat","margin2020":-37.40233,"votes2016":782719,"margin2016":-37.1,"votes2012":815825,"margin2012":-46.83},

Wayne County votes: 587074+264149+6551+2438+1561+1073+536=863382 ( Checks out, all adds up )

Wayne County absentee votes: 325787+105517+2567+989+502+464+211=436037 ( Checks out, all adds up )

Comments (34)
sorted by:
6
Nomad1 6 points ago +6 / -0

A mathematician named Edward Solomon reverse engineered the algorithm and arrived at a similar conclusion. He put out an hour long video and stepped through the entire process.

3
CrackerJack2 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks.
Will look at.

2
leroy1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wheres the video?

3
Nomad1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Edward Solomon - dominion vote algorithm https://youtu.be/KIlI46HdqKg

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
9
EdwardSolomon 9 points ago +9 / -0

My definition of ratio (so far as voting is concerned) is the quotient of two integers.

For the purposes of my research, this quotient is Trump's Total divided by the Grand Total, for each precinct on each timestamp.

May I ask something, what is your definition of a ratio?

Also, may I ask you, do you know how to perform an Inverse Floor Function, without brute forcing it, because over at MathStackExchange, their only solution, is to brute force it, as I did.

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2815868/finding-an-inverse-for-a-function-with-floor https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2158890/inverse-of-a-floor-function

Have a good day.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
7
EdwardSolomon 7 points ago +7 / -0

The same way everyone does...???

It's the integer component of the division of two numbers.

Do you have a problem with that?

7
nicmarlo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Edward, (this is Lori Chiov from YT)

Have you thought of contacting Bobby Piton in AZ? He’s the math guy that testified at AZ hearing. He’s starting to work with others in exposing the fraud in other states too. Here’s his tweet about it from yesterday.

https://mobile.twitter.com/BobbyPiton3/status/1339369874494279680

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
8
EdwardSolomon 8 points ago +8 / -0

???

Natural data won't have one.

Fraud is the answer.

You can brute force the answer...the same way everyone else does...if there's even an answer.

You won't get an answer for natural data, until you hit the trivial range (around 87% the highest denominator). We have answers that are under 50%, with one in one octillion chances of being a natural solution.

good day

In Atlanta the case is even stronger, not only was the solution 2231, but the manufactured ratios converged and clumped around increment of x/23 and x/97, where the 2231 is the product of 23 and 97.

If you want, you can join Joe BIden's defense team and challenge me.

You obviously get a tingle up your leg everyone time Joe speaks.

2
Error404 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand the math of what you're doing but I'm not anything like the dummies dispoooooting you without explanation. I FULLY SUPPORT YOU, KEEP UP THE AMAZING WORK EDWARD.

I get that you are extremely busy with a daunting amount of work ahead. Please, if you have a minute, and check out the couple wheels I made inspired by you. YOU ARE AWESOME

https://media.thedonald.win/post/0AtUEEzO.png

https://media.thedonald.win/post/be8XpFwm.jpeg

I hope you like them.

2
rosebluesky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dear Ed, please respond briefly to this false speculation, that you are doing ok my friend!

https://thedonald.win/p/11R4lIVr2X/breaking-news--edward-solomon-ha/c/

People are concerned. Stay safe. Looking forward to your great work on Michigan today!

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
CrackerJack2 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

What I'm saying is Dominion or another piece of software are limiting, at a county level, the votes in the smaller strong Trump counties to the EEVP / total expected vote.
This thereby prevents or hides the extra votes that Trump most likely got in these Counties. Since there are many smaller counties in States like Michigan, 83 counties total, this can add up to potentially 100,000 votes or more.

Further indirect proof can be seen in the Antrim 'glitch', and the disappearance of Nov. 2020 data for different. Michigan counties on the internet.

3
MsAnthropic 3 points ago +3 / -0

And it would be hard to detect, because the “expected” number of votes have come in. But this process then effectively kills Trump’s massive voter turnout.

If you’re not sure whether Trump’s team have seen this, you should try to get it to them. Can you submit it at hereistheevidence.com?

2
CrackerJack2 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great idea.
I wanted to have some People review it first to make sure I wasn't missing something.

2
Dman82 2 points ago +2 / -0

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh my head hurts

2
Nomad1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Edward Solomon - dominion vote algorithm https://youtu.be/KIlI46HdqKg

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Medtex1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wtf man!!