105
posted ago by CrackerJack2 ago by CrackerJack2 +105 / -0

Please Review and comment as this could be very important in understanding how this election was seemingly stolen via Dominion software and/or other software programs.

This is the 1st time this has been proposed, I think, so constructive criticism and a through going over is welcomed and encouraged. Thank you.



NY Times feed data seems to point directly to an external or coordinated manipulation of strong Trump Counties votes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and other states.      
This is clearly seen in some of the small counties data that almost always vote for heavily for President Trump.  
This 'Capping', however, did NOT occur in many Biden stronghold Counties such as Wayne County.   Obviously, it seems real proof of a large, coordinated VOTER FRAUD scheme. 
 
The following is just one case of many counties that most likely have been controlled by some software to put an artificial 'Cap' on the Trump votes as counted using the Edison Research/ National Election Pool database.  These pool results are then fed to all the major news outlets, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and NYTimes on election night.     
The 'cap' seems to kick in when the vote in these small Trump Counties exceeds the EEVP, what A.P. ( Associated Press) and now Edison Research call the "Estimated Expected Vote Percentage".       
The eevp is almost certainly a percentage of the registered vote.  
  
The eevp seems most likely around 70% of vote,  for Antrim County, with 22,082 registered voters, and 15,415 votes gives:           15,415÷ 22,082  
      = 0.698 ~ 0.70 = 70%
      
Typical 'capped' Vote County:

Arenac County, Michigan:
(N.Y. Times election results feed)

 Total votes tabulated:  "votes":8830,"
     "eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":8830,"
total expected vote is equal to EEVP.   
  
It is very, very unlikely that the total actual vote would be exactly equal to the EEVP or "tot_exp_vote" (total expected vote), as all of these 8,830 voters, no more, no less, are said to have shown up to vote in Arenac County to vote.

The fact that a number of other counties in Michigan also had the same very, very unlikely occurance makes it an almost complete statistical impossibility!

   (Arenac County Population
Estimate (2018)      15,041 )  
( Arenac County registered voters: 12,220 (as of 8/4/2020) )  
( 8830/12,220=0.7226 (close to 70%))
    ( election results from NYTimes feed      confirmed in newspaper:   (https://www.arenacindependent.com/articles/unofficial-election-results-for-arenac-county-2/) ).

     ( NYTimes feed:)  
{"fips":"26011","name":"Arenac","votes":8830,"absentee_votes":0,"reporting":15,"precincts":15,"absentee_method":"Merged into voters' home precincts and released with cumulative results","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":8830,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":6,"absentee_count_progress":"unknown","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":563,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":2773,"trumpd":5928,"jorgensenj":97,"blankenshipd":17,"hawkinsh":12,"de_la_fuenter":3,"write-ins":0},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":0,"trumpd":0,"jorgensenj":0,"blankenshipd":0,"hawkinsh":0,"de_la_fuenter":0,"write-ins":0},"last_updated":"2020-11-04T17:58:32Z","leader_margin_value":35.73046,"leader_margin_display":"R+36","leader_margin_name_display":"Trump +36","leader_party_id":"republican","margin2020":35.73046,"votes2016":7729,"margin2016":33.2,"votes2012":7841,"margin2012":4.95},

Uncapped Vote in 'Trump' County in Michigan:
Antrim County.
Why?  Because someone actually went back and reviewed the votes by hand, so someone corrected and updated the results AFTER this incident.
This is the famous county in Michigan with the 'glitch'.

Antrim County:
Total Votes recorded: 17347
"eevp"100","tot_exp_vote":15415
( total expected vote)

*******  
(!Antrim updated 2020-11-06T01:56:38Z !) *******   
{"fips":"26009","name":"Antrim","votes":17347,"absentee_votes":0,"reporting":16,"precincts":16,"absentee_method":"Merged into voters' home precincts AFTER election night","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":15415,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":2,"absentee_count_progress":"unknown","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":2188,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":7289,"trumpd":9783,"jorgensenj":197,"hawkinsh":28,"blankenshipd":22,"write-ins":20,"de_la_fuenter":8},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":0,"trumpd":0,"jorgensenj":0,"hawkinsh":0,"blankenshipd":0,"write-ins":0,"de_la_fuenter":0},"last_updated":"2020-11-06T01:56:38Z","leader_margin_value":14.37713,"leader_margin_display":"R+14","leader_margin_name_display":"Trump +14","leader_party_id":"republican","margin2020":14.37713,"votes2016":13667,"margin2016":29.4,"votes2012":13195,"margin2012":21.3},

WAYNE COUNTY

"votes":863382
"absentee_votes":436037
"eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":840000,"
.
There seems to be a Gaming of the vote, as more votes were allowed in Wayne County than the smaller counties:
ex. Clinton, Clare, Crawford, etc., all strong Trump Counties, which were only allowed by a program to reach 100% of expected vote.
.
NY Times election feed:
{"fips":"26163","name":"Wayne","votes":863382,"absentee_votes":436037,"reporting":955,"precincts":1017,"absentee_method":"Released separately AFTER election night","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":840000,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":4,"absentee_count_progress":"unknown","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":172169,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":587074,"trumpd":264149,"jorgensenj":6551,"hawkinsh":2438,"write-ins":1561,"blankenshipd":1073,"de_la_fuenter":536},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":325787,"trumpd":105517,"jorgensenj":2567,"hawkinsh":989,"write-ins":502,"blankenshipd":464,"de_la_fuenter":211},"last_updated":"2020-11-05T13:34:42Z","leader_margin_value":37.40233,"leader_margin_display":"D+37","leader_margin_name_display":"Biden +37","leader_party_id":"democrat","margin2020":-37.40233,"votes2016":782719,"margin2016":-37.1,"votes2012":815825,"margin2012":-46.83},

Wayne County votes: 587074+264149+6551+2438+1561+1073+536=863382 ( Checks out, all adds up )

Wayne County absentee votes: 325787+105517+2567+989+502+464+211=436037 ( Checks out, all adds up )

Comments (34)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
8
EdwardSolomon 8 points ago +8 / -0

???

Natural data won't have one.

Fraud is the answer.

You can brute force the answer...the same way everyone else does...if there's even an answer.

You won't get an answer for natural data, until you hit the trivial range (around 87% the highest denominator). We have answers that are under 50%, with one in one octillion chances of being a natural solution.

good day

In Atlanta the case is even stronger, not only was the solution 2231, but the manufactured ratios converged and clumped around increment of x/23 and x/97, where the 2231 is the product of 23 and 97.

If you want, you can join Joe BIden's defense team and challenge me.

You obviously get a tingle up your leg everyone time Joe speaks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
MAGArocket 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you even read his affidavits or seen the summary of Ed's work?

He has posted them here: https://thedonald.win/p/11R4XKC6Fs/someone-needs-to-spam-sindey-pow/