383
Wowzers. (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by thakiddd ago by thakiddd +387 / -4
Comments (131)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
23
bubble_bursts 23 points ago +24 / -1

If you think carefully there is nothing explosive here. Pretty much everything people suspected. However I dont think Russia disabled the Hillary hack. It was probably NSA white hats.

18
CubanitoLopez 18 points ago +19 / -1

No because th3 white hats would do the same in this election. Trump broke the algorithm in 2016 and 2020 (stopped count in 5 states to assess how much 5o print and redo algorithms)

26
bubble_bursts 26 points ago +26 / -0

That is exactly the logical reason why I believe this election was a sting. If the goal was to ensure there is no fraud, they could ahve stopped it very easily.

14
fapoo 14 points ago +14 / -0

^^^ This whole conversation I've had in my head.

5
Vox_Dobad 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know, I go round and round with this stuff in my head

3
CubanitoLopez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great minds think alike.

5
CubanitoLopez 5 points ago +6 / -1

Man i think we are giving these people way too much credit. I would be super surprised if this is a sting.

8
stoic_troll 8 points ago +9 / -1

EO 13848 indicates Trump knew it was coming.

7
bubble_bursts 7 points ago +7 / -0

But think of it as a devils advocate. So lets say Russians somehow prevented the Democrat hacking. But NSA doesn't know how to do this. Then 2018 election comes, and the hack goes through (there is a blue wave in Congress). NSA wasn't even watching what was going on? NSA couldnt figure out in 4 years what russians knew in 2016 magically?

Logical conclusion is whether Russians prevented the 2016 hacking or not, NSA would have been capable of doing the same in 2020, if they wanted. Then why didn't they? If they had prevented it, none of the other local frauds would have been enought to turn the tide.

I still think this was a sting. We will wait and see.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
IntegrityCritical 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plus the insane amount of campaign rallies for weeks/months. I was watching this dumbfounded at his ability to do this and the why of why he would. Not normal For any campaign ever. This was to force them to cheat so obviously that nobody who was real with themself could dispute it. He knew.

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s super fake. Tons of documents that Hillary planted the trump/Russia story before the election even happened.

3
bubble_bursts 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also, recently declassified docs showed that Putin preferred Hillary over Trump by a small margin, purely because she was a known factor to him

1
Imransgarage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, it’s fake as tits in Miami.

1
thakiddd [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly.

0
Bragg 0 points ago +2 / -2

If they did, they didn't do their best job as there is no way Hillary got the popular vote. She would be more than 10 million behind Trump.

0
bubble_bursts 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah, my personal belief is that they weren't fully able to suppress it, but they did the big parts, but a lot of it still seeped through. I think 2016 would be written in books when all this is finished, along with every aspect of Trump's presidency and every week after the election.