wait till they find out the globalists have been using private institutions and banks to finance communism. The problem we have is monopolies and loss of masculinity. Big tech has the market cornered and women have the discourse cornered.
Talmud explicitly sets criterion for punishing a man who dresses as a woman, homosexuality, beastiality, etc. etc. I suggest you read the actual Talmud from a non-88 site.
Orban was placed into power via Finkle Think, with Mega Zionist Finkle running his Political Campaign for him. He was sponsored by Jews as a controlled op on rising Eastern European Nationalism. Look into it.
The capital-L Libertarian will vote for a politician that promises to ban semi-automatic rifles, because hey - they also promised to legalize weed and lower taxes by a hair. And isn't that what really matters?
If you don’t give so much power to the government in the first place, what will a leftist radical be able to do?
Easiest place to start would be with government-funded schools. There should be no taxpayer funding of universities or grade schools. American children are some of the worst performing at math of kids in developed countries, plus there’s all the left-wing propaganda.
Until something YOU believe is deemed "licentious", or "degenerate", or whatever buzzword is substituted for "hateful" or "bigoted" to make the same idea sound good to the right.
Psuedo enlightenment through "questioning" and subversion of fundamental truths is how socialism came to our shores. We were too blind to their Trojan horse of graduality and good intentions ["we want to love too" (homosexual marriage), "it will only be used in the most fringe of cases" (aborticide)]. Now we pay the heavy price.
It is not primarily from Christian culture, that we know the family arrangment is one male and one female. That is from basic human biology, that is universal to all peoples and religions.
"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes. " Prov. 26:4-5
"And they brought him unto him: and when he saw him, straightway the spirit tare him; and he fell on the ground, and wallowed foaming. And he asked his father, How long is it ago since this came unto him? And he said, Of a child. And ofttimes it hath cast him into the fire, and into the waters, to destroy him: but if thou canst do any thing, have compassion on us, and help us. Jesus said unto him, If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth. And straightway the father of the child cried out, and said with tears, Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief. When Jesus saw that the people came running together, he rebuked the foul spirit, saying unto him, Thou dumb and deaf spirit, I charge thee, come out of him, and enter no more into him. And the spirit cried, and rent him sore, and came out of him: and he was as one dead; insomuch that many said, He is dead. But Jesus took him by the hand, and lifted him up; and he arose." Mark 9:20-27
To summarize: a man brings his son to Jesus to be healed. The man's son suffers from seizures due to demonic possession. The man expresses doubt when he says, "if you can do anything, have compassion on us, and help us," with the word "if" being the defining word. The man must've had a measure of faith to bring his son to Jesus in the first place, but he nevertheless had doubts. This may be due in part or in whole to Jesus' disciples being unsuccessful in casting out the demon (Mark 9:17-18). Jesus replies that all things are possible if you can believe. The man then expresses that he believes. In other words, he's choosing to have faith in spite of recent disappointment and he asks Jesus to help him overcome his doubt. To both accomplish this and heal the man's son, Jesus casts out the demon.
As for Proverbs 26:4-5, that's an example of poetic parallelism. Each of the sentences needs to be understood on its own before comparing them. The first says to not respond to a fool in a foolish manner, while the second says that you should correct a fool for his own good, no contradiction.
To my understanding, a gray area basically means that whether something is acceptable or not in a moral or legal sense is uncertain or debatable. I don't see how the aforementioned verses fit that description.
The human male and female arrangement is different from the arrangements we see in the animal kingdom because humans are categorically different in how they have reason.
Through human reason we know that human children need to be raised before they are able to fully exercise liberty as free persons.
A lot of this is still relevant because it applies to universal human nature. It is better when our laws of the state align with the laws of nature. Setting apart the male-female arrangement is a positive way to do this. Hungary is doing a healthy thing for their society.
Which is that we should be building a K-Selected society (what we had for hundreds of years, here). Instead, in the last 50 years we've been trending towards an r-Selected society.
K-Selected = Stable and Respectful
r-Selected = World War Z
If we had kept the concept of K-Selected, the idea that marriage could be some sort of term that we can move around and alter like Play-Doh... would be completely a foreign, dare I say alien idea.
Edit: It's another reason why the so-called sexual liberation of the 60s has had such devastating effects on society nowadays, not to mention the travesty that is divorce law. You can only fuck over the men ensuring society keeps running, and science and technology keeps advancing, for so long before something gives.
The sad part is now you actually pass a law to define something that should be obvious to everyone....almost like passing a law to define the sky as being blue....
That's a cuck way of looking at it. Strong men need to define and reiterate everything, that's how you know where all the lines are. It's not redundant and unnecessary. The west is dying because men do not want to "define" anything and leave it up to everyone's feelings and opinions to decide what's "right" for them.
The west is dying because some men with the full power and backing of the government are using women to tell the rest of us what we can and cannot do while making all sorts of situations that take power away from us while lumping on even more responsibilities.
I can try to define anything I want but if some feminist decides that's not "correct" or is "harmful to women" the full might of the government is going to come slamming down on me to tell me I'm wrong and will be punished for it. Fix that and things start to go back to the way that they used to be when we weren't living in clown world.
We also have to pass laws saying murder and rape are bad and punishable. That should be obvious, but people can be awful and laws are there to define societal boundaries for the people who are prone to transgressing them.
Poles would've been awesome if they weren't so fucking stupid and easily manipulated by the rest of european powers to war with other Slav nations. Many Western Slavs have this strange identity crisis thing where they claim they want to stay independent from Russia's influence but readily submit to any western europe's domination. Then they cry about how the Russians made them do it. For hundreds of years. Poles (and Lithuanians) have to be the worst offenders in this.
Russian "anti-semitism" stems from something entirely different, it's a whole different discussion that also has roots in Russo-Polish relationships in general.
And that history goes back 600 or maybe more years. For most Americans, these kinds of things are more or less impossible to comprehend. Shit, I was born in a tiny town in Russia that is older than the United States and that history is all over the place, it's taught, the tradition is taught, you can feel it in everything. This is why Russians are fairly nationalistic even now, although, I digress... The point is, shit's complex, Poles aren't the saints the dimwits here paint them to be, but then, nobody else is either.
I thought that's pretty much exactly what theyve done (vis a vis sticking it to the EU, Germany in particular). I still remember Merkel and Germany trying really hard to force them to adopt their feckless immigration/invasion scheme and Poland promptly shut that shit down by reminding Germany that it was Germany and technically owed them wartime reparations big time. 🔥🔥🔥😂
I find myself tempted to learn their language and find me a single Hungarian woman. Virtuous women in the US are literally needles in massive haystacks.
Isn’t it interesting how a country that was held under communist rule blatantly rejects communist ideas now, and does everything they’d an to prevent it from happening.
I agree with the statement on principle, but in the US we do not need or want the government to define what God has already defined for us. Everyone should be treated as an individual with individual rights. The government should not define or legislate anything not expressly permitted in their enumerated powers by the constitution. Conservatives fell into this trap with the whole gay marriage fiasco. If we want a constitutional republic we need to stop expecting the government to do things they were never intended or designed to do. This is the reason we are sliding into tyranny.
You made great points but the problem is that our enemies already wield power and they pass those laws to put us under tyranny.if we were living in pre-1970 America, your points would be helpful but we live in a leftist degenerate America which trampled on whites,christians,Americans etc.
There is concept of individual rights which is important but a society should be able to stop some things from happening.the government is never meant to define marriage but Obama did it and the only way to stop it is by removing that legislation.
Reminder: Every major cultural issue in the USA was hijacked by Elite Technocrats, was not a result of Organic, Bottom-Up Democracy:
School Prayer Ban - SCOTUS
Abortion - SCOTUS
Gay Marriage - SCOTUS
Gay Marriage Was Explicitly banned by Referendum in CA and the Court overturned it just 10 years ago. Reminder: Sodomy laws were enforced and upheld by SCOTUS in the 80s and 90s.
I like "criminal conversation" or "alienation of affection". I believe in NC and some other states, they still have the old law that allows one to sue a seducer of a spouse.
Some poor young, religious guy had his wife seduced away by a co-worker. They laughed at him and called him pathetic. He sued and won hundreds of thousands. Let's just say they won't be getting a car or home loan anytime soon.
Since my grandfather came from Poland after the war I can technically get Polish citizenship the problem is I don't want to deal with those long ass Slavic names
Children only originate through one male and one female, and until they are old enough to consent to alternative arrangments, they shouldn't be forced into a different family arrangment. And states, businesses, and other organizations shouldn't be banned from setting apart the one male one female arrangment as unique.
It's true, if you don't know what gender you are and do opposite of what your nature is, then you should not be allowed to adopt children since all form of sexual perversion outside of man and woman is a mental disorder.
This could be the US, if we are brave enough.
"But muh freedom!" -American commie
That's not freedom, that's licentiousness
"But muh 'non-aggression' principle!"
- a Libertarian
pretty cure the government brainwashing your kids is aggression.
But if a private company does it as a proxy for government then it’s okay–Libertarians
wait till they find out the globalists have been using private institutions and banks to finance communism. The problem we have is monopolies and loss of masculinity. Big tech has the market cornered and women have the discourse cornered.
“Cornering the market just means they have good products.”
-also a libertarian, probably
Like Hungary you must address the roots of the problem, and how it came about.
The Culture of Critique.
The Principal of Inversion. You reading or listening to Dr. Joseph P. Farrell?
Talmud explicitly sets criterion for punishing a man who dresses as a woman, homosexuality, beastiality, etc. etc. I suggest you read the actual Talmud from a non-88 site.
Hungary is pro Israel
Can we regain neutrality in our Middle East foreign policy.
Orban was placed into power via Finkle Think, with Mega Zionist Finkle running his Political Campaign for him. He was sponsored by Jews as a controlled op on rising Eastern European Nationalism. Look into it.
Okay, but try telling someone that doesn't believe in objective morality that two men can't marry and adopt a son.
you can, but that doesnt mean you should. The fact that this degeneracy is being pushed so brazenly shows we are now firmly under the Bolshevik grasp.
No, you can't. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
right, but that wont stop international communists from using degenerates to redefine it
The capital-L Libertarian will vote for a politician that promises to ban semi-automatic rifles, because hey - they also promised to legalize weed and lower taxes by a hair. And isn't that what really matters?
For Libertarians, protecting Christianity and the Nuclear Family is the gateway to Toaster Licenses.
LMAO brilliantly put
Imagine having to actually declare that a mother is a woman and a father is a man. That's the clown world we live in
The libertarian principle to me simply means this:
Leave me be and leave others alone.
Okay so is that a “yes” or a “no” on the faggots adopting orphaned children?
If you give the government more control over our lives, liberals can abuse it too when they’re in power. Careful what you wish for..
Stop printing money, taking away my free speech, taking my guns and telling me how to raise my kids.
Would rather see kids raised by a mom and dad. Look at Finland’s feminist prime minister raised by two lesbians to see how that’s turning out..
That’s why you don’t let them into power and you do it by any means necessary. This is not too hard.
If you don’t give so much power to the government in the first place, what will a leftist radical be able to do?
Easiest place to start would be with government-funded schools. There should be no taxpayer funding of universities or grade schools. American children are some of the worst performing at math of kids in developed countries, plus there’s all the left-wing propaganda.
>licentiousness
A word a day...
Until something YOU believe is deemed "licentious", or "degenerate", or whatever buzzword is substituted for "hateful" or "bigoted" to make the same idea sound good to the right.
We NEED this
We would have it if we had fair elections and a DoJ that actually upheld the law instead of protecting the evil.
Psuedo enlightenment through "questioning" and subversion of fundamental truths is how socialism came to our shores. We were too blind to their Trojan horse of graduality and good intentions ["we want to love too" (homosexual marriage), "it will only be used in the most fringe of cases" (aborticide)]. Now we pay the heavy price.
Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Nature, faggot. Gtfo here.
Oh, you are a retarded shill! Be gone, pedo scum!
If we get rid of all the CCP infiltrators in all levels of our country and institutions, then this will be us too.
It is not primarily from Christian culture, that we know the family arrangment is one male and one female. That is from basic human biology, that is universal to all peoples and religions.
The evolution of sexes have less chance than Biden winning the election.
Biology is from God. Atheism is the gateway to communism.
He's just talking about from an anthropological standpoint, even societies that aren't explicitly Christian recognize this... but yeah, you're right.
Once you take the God pill, everything is black and white. Grey areas are the devils play ground.
Not so:
"I believe, help my unbelief." - Mark 9:24
"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes. " Prov. 26:4-5
For the first, context.
To summarize: a man brings his son to Jesus to be healed. The man's son suffers from seizures due to demonic possession. The man expresses doubt when he says, "if you can do anything, have compassion on us, and help us," with the word "if" being the defining word. The man must've had a measure of faith to bring his son to Jesus in the first place, but he nevertheless had doubts. This may be due in part or in whole to Jesus' disciples being unsuccessful in casting out the demon (Mark 9:17-18). Jesus replies that all things are possible if you can believe. The man then expresses that he believes. In other words, he's choosing to have faith in spite of recent disappointment and he asks Jesus to help him overcome his doubt. To both accomplish this and heal the man's son, Jesus casts out the demon.
As for Proverbs 26:4-5, that's an example of poetic parallelism. Each of the sentences needs to be understood on its own before comparing them. The first says to not respond to a fool in a foolish manner, while the second says that you should correct a fool for his own good, no contradiction.
Yes, definitely not a contradiction, but things I would call gray areas. Maybe we would differ on what should be called a gray area.
To my understanding, a gray area basically means that whether something is acceptable or not in a moral or legal sense is uncertain or debatable. I don't see how the aforementioned verses fit that description.
Yes, there is male and female, but it is VERY rare for animals to bond with a single mate. Most animals are promiscuous.
The human male and female arrangement is different from the arrangements we see in the animal kingdom because humans are categorically different in how they have reason.
Through human reason we know that human children need to be raised before they are able to fully exercise liberty as free persons.
For how human reason relates to natural law, see Blackstone's Commentary on the Law (very influential in the formation of U.S. law): http://www.gutenberg.org/files/30802/30802-h/30802-h.htm#Section_the_second
And here is how Natural Law applies to the parent child relationship: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/30802/30802-h/30802-h.htm#Chapter_the_sixteenth
A lot of this is still relevant because it applies to universal human nature. It is better when our laws of the state align with the laws of nature. Setting apart the male-female arrangement is a positive way to do this. Hungary is doing a healthy thing for their society.
Yeah because they need to be. There's always another animal around the corner waiting to eat your young.
Like democrats.
This underscores the larger issue.
Which is that we should be building a K-Selected society (what we had for hundreds of years, here). Instead, in the last 50 years we've been trending towards an r-Selected society.
K-Selected = Stable and Respectful r-Selected = World War Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
If we had kept the concept of K-Selected, the idea that marriage could be some sort of term that we can move around and alter like Play-Doh... would be completely a foreign, dare I say alien idea.
Except of course for the Mormons.
Indeed. K-Selected societies build wonders, r-selected societies destroy civilizations.
Edit: It's another reason why the so-called sexual liberation of the 60s has had such devastating effects on society nowadays, not to mention the travesty that is divorce law. You can only fuck over the men ensuring society keeps running, and science and technology keeps advancing, for so long before something gives.
The sad part is now you actually pass a law to define something that should be obvious to everyone....almost like passing a law to define the sky as being blue....
Back to the Bible (Genesis 1) or back to the jungle. This just delays the inevitable if people keep rejecting their true origins.
That's a cuck way of looking at it. Strong men need to define and reiterate everything, that's how you know where all the lines are. It's not redundant and unnecessary. The west is dying because men do not want to "define" anything and leave it up to everyone's feelings and opinions to decide what's "right" for them.
The west is dying because some men with the full power and backing of the government are using women to tell the rest of us what we can and cannot do while making all sorts of situations that take power away from us while lumping on even more responsibilities.
I can try to define anything I want but if some feminist decides that's not "correct" or is "harmful to women" the full might of the government is going to come slamming down on me to tell me I'm wrong and will be punished for it. Fix that and things start to go back to the way that they used to be when we weren't living in clown world.
Doesn't include all men in the west.
We also have to pass laws saying murder and rape are bad and punishable. That should be obvious, but people can be awful and laws are there to define societal boundaries for the people who are prone to transgressing them.
Or like the second amendment
Damn. Now I'm tempted to become a dual citizen. Based Hungary.
Poland is still #1 bae spot for dual citizenship desirability 😂
Slavs have common sense, but, my god, are the Poles salty about getting their asses kicked by Russians.
The Russians are gone. They need to focus on their own affairs instead of getting into bed with NATO and the EU.
Poles would've been awesome if they weren't so fucking stupid and easily manipulated by the rest of european powers to war with other Slav nations. Many Western Slavs have this strange identity crisis thing where they claim they want to stay independent from Russia's influence but readily submit to any western europe's domination. Then they cry about how the Russians made them do it. For hundreds of years. Poles (and Lithuanians) have to be the worst offenders in this.
Lithuanians and Poles were some of the most willing collaborators during the Holocaust.
Not saying Russians aren’t anti-Semitic, but they were too busy fighting the Nazis to participate.
Russian "anti-semitism" stems from something entirely different, it's a whole different discussion that also has roots in Russo-Polish relationships in general.
And that history goes back 600 or maybe more years. For most Americans, these kinds of things are more or less impossible to comprehend. Shit, I was born in a tiny town in Russia that is older than the United States and that history is all over the place, it's taught, the tradition is taught, you can feel it in everything. This is why Russians are fairly nationalistic even now, although, I digress... The point is, shit's complex, Poles aren't the saints the dimwits here paint them to be, but then, nobody else is either.
That’s right. Shit is complicated indeed.
Best we keep our beaks out of everyone else’s business and fix our own problems first.
https://youtu.be/f0Iu2CAwQaU?t=11
I thought that's pretty much exactly what theyve done (vis a vis sticking it to the EU, Germany in particular). I still remember Merkel and Germany trying really hard to force them to adopt their feckless immigration/invasion scheme and Poland promptly shut that shit down by reminding Germany that it was Germany and technically owed them wartime reparations big time. 🔥🔥🔥😂
The EU was a joke from the start. Herding cats is unnecessary.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rvYuoWyk8iU
100% agree on that front. The EU = more bureaucratic pipeline to fit more hungry government do-nothing mouths.
Those poor middle-class people in the UK and Germany pay upwards of 45-50% personal income taxes! What does that get them in the end?
I find myself tempted to learn their language and find me a single Hungarian woman. Virtuous women in the US are literally needles in massive haystacks.
Could you imagine this headline 40 years ago?
Good point.
I just did and LOL'd pretty good.
I don't necessarily care about this but it sorta feels like Hungary is adopting our old core values and there is something to be said about that.
I wish we would adopt most of our old core values.
I should move to Hungary.
I would like to retire there, but the government is gun-phobic, and the people would hate a "2nd Amendment", so no way.
People in the Czech Republic really like guns. I suggest considering that country. Prague looks very safe for tourists.
No, you shouldn't.
I just sent this to some very liberal friends... Now I wait.....
They hate Eastern Europe anyway because they hate God. True story.
>because they hate God
Explain their blind love of islam then.
Easy, Muslims believe in a false god and are also trying to destroy Christianity.
The biggest haters of Christianity are not Muslims.Muslims are in the west solely because of another group.
I know that.
Isn’t it interesting how a country that was held under communist rule blatantly rejects communist ideas now, and does everything they’d an to prevent it from happening.
It's a sad state of affairs that this even needs to be clarified.
Based
Eastern Europe will be the last bastion of western culture, mark my words.
But they haven't closed their borders between themselves, why block westerners to travel to other western lands then?
I agree with the statement on principle, but in the US we do not need or want the government to define what God has already defined for us. Everyone should be treated as an individual with individual rights. The government should not define or legislate anything not expressly permitted in their enumerated powers by the constitution. Conservatives fell into this trap with the whole gay marriage fiasco. If we want a constitutional republic we need to stop expecting the government to do things they were never intended or designed to do. This is the reason we are sliding into tyranny.
i wished more people were like you
You made great points but the problem is that our enemies already wield power and they pass those laws to put us under tyranny.if we were living in pre-1970 America, your points would be helpful but we live in a leftist degenerate America which trampled on whites,christians,Americans etc. There is concept of individual rights which is important but a society should be able to stop some things from happening.the government is never meant to define marriage but Obama did it and the only way to stop it is by removing that legislation.
Based on how the alt-lifestyle crowd has conducted themselves I highly applauded this.
I'd consider moving there, but they're simply surrounded by the enemy and won't stand a chance when the NWO comes calling.
Hungary is part of NATO
Exactly his point.
All the reeeditors on r/Europe are pissed off. 🤣
The Hungarians have always been based. Look into the Hungarian uprising of 1956. They know who's behind all this shit.
Reminder: Every major cultural issue in the USA was hijacked by Elite Technocrats, was not a result of Organic, Bottom-Up Democracy:
Gay Marriage Was Explicitly banned by Referendum in CA and the Court overturned it just 10 years ago. Reminder: Sodomy laws were enforced and upheld by SCOTUS in the 80s and 90s.
I liked the adultery laws too.
I like "criminal conversation" or "alienation of affection". I believe in NC and some other states, they still have the old law that allows one to sue a seducer of a spouse.
Some poor young, religious guy had his wife seduced away by a co-worker. They laughed at him and called him pathetic. He sued and won hundreds of thousands. Let's just say they won't be getting a car or home loan anytime soon.
I told people a few days ago that Hungary was a based center-right country and a few people kept telling me I was wrong. I don’t know why.
I want to move there. Will probably end badly, at some point, just like here.
My visit to BUdapest was very enjoyable last year. I recommend it!
The way it should be here.
Wonder why only Eastern European countries still maintain some source of MANHOOD attitude and thinking?
Stop making me want to move, Hungary!
Thanks for sharing the link.
This looks like a good, straight-to-the-facts, no-nonsense, European conservative news website. Bookmarked.
Always on the hunt for good, factual news sources. Thanks!
Way to go...we need to follow this!!!!
Hungary gun laws are still cucked worse than New Jersey’s.
Until that changes Hungary is just another complicit globalist shithole.
I’ll add Hungary as a backup place to live
Soros demands the EU to send troops and take over!
I like how monogamous biological reproduction is somehow Christian...
Look at all these fucking Christian birds out here being partners for life.
No one fights better when surrounded by the innumerable forces of evil than the Hungarians.
If that is Judit in the pic, I will listen to her.
Very sensible.
I know where I am moving, I love paprika too.
Hungary looking like a better place than the US to live in.
The term "Hungarian ClusterFuck" takes on a deeper meaning now.
Since my grandfather came from Poland after the war I can technically get Polish citizenship the problem is I don't want to deal with those long ass Slavic names
Meh.
Children only originate through one male and one female, and until they are old enough to consent to alternative arrangments, they shouldn't be forced into a different family arrangment. And states, businesses, and other organizations shouldn't be banned from setting apart the one male one female arrangment as unique.
What's next on your mind, the argument for consenting to your own existence first?!
Desperate moves to prop up failing institutions aside..probably best that people who don't know what gender they are can't have kids.
I'm going to go even further.....IT IS best that people that don't know what gender they are not to have kids.
Or even a potted plant, for that matter.
Not sure if it's worth making cohabitation equal marriage though. That will destroy a lot of naive/ill-informed people.
Yeah, the biggest trap women's groups ever set. Nobody knows about it unless they research and by then it's too late.
Nobody should ever be forced into a contract without informed consent. If it wasn't propping up their rackets, it would be illegal.
When women were chaste it made sense. After women's liberation it became a trap
It never made sense. The idea of providing for another person who did nothing but exist was a stupid one, made necessary by biology.
It makes sense for society as a whole, but for the individual it makes as much sense as juggling chainsaws while wearing oven mitts.
Think of it like having a pet
The government's role is to protect and enforce a contract. Two people making a cohabitation contract should be accepted and protected.
The government has no right, whatsoever, to be involved in my marriage. That always has been and always will be a religious sacrament.
Why are you being down voted?
It's true, if you don't know what gender you are and do opposite of what your nature is, then you should not be allowed to adopt children since all form of sexual perversion outside of man and woman is a mental disorder.
Because I said defining cohabitation as marriage is a bad thing and basically a trap.