Like I said, read the actual Talmud, which is commentary on the OT, and not a synopsis of it by bigots who themselves put "Traditions" - including those now abandoned by their own Church - over the Bible.
Note that the Talmud is NOT over the Torah/OT. It is commentary by the learned, by a multitude of theologians, and people are free to dispute it. The Torah is always primary.
Not in there. Egyptians != Gentiles, esp. the context is commentary on Exodus.
That's a great example of "Bigoted" reading of the Talmud where the Anti-Semites change "Egyptian" to "Gentile" when "explaining" it.
That's why I suggest you read or browse the Talmud from a site that displays it without the "Commentary." from anti-semites, rather than snippets carefully engineered to give a false impression.
The points they raise and quotes cited are beyond difficult to refute. So the Substance is the key, not the messengers.
Like I said, read the actual Talmud, which is commentary on the OT, and not a synopsis of it by bigots who themselves put "Traditions" - including those now abandoned by their own Church - over the Bible.
Note that the Talmud is NOT over the Torah/OT. It is commentary by the learned, by a multitude of theologians, and people are free to dispute it. The Torah is always primary.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/babylonian-talmud-full-text
What parts of the Talmud do you feel are incorrect? I know it’s just commentary, but I am interested in your opinion.
Do gentiles deserve to die? Is it okay to deceive about what the Talmud teaches? If a gentile wants to learn about the Talmud should he be murdered?
Not in there. Egyptians != Gentiles, esp. the context is commentary on Exodus.
That's a great example of "Bigoted" reading of the Talmud where the Anti-Semites change "Egyptian" to "Gentile" when "explaining" it.
That's why I suggest you read or browse the Talmud from a site that displays it without the "Commentary." from anti-semites, rather than snippets carefully engineered to give a false impression.