Data science experts scrutinize the vote tallies and data from election night across the state of Arizona. Included is the raw data feed for this state, should you like to follow along and review for yourself. https://gofile.io/d/mFNhyr
You know what would be useful here, and it would be easy to make into a tweet and try to get it spread high/wide? A definitive conclusion with hard numbers.
"Subtracting out the fraud we can see, the actual vote tallies for Arizona is Trump X, Biden Y, making Trump the winner. Here's how we got there."
That would get retweeted everywhere.
The thing that makes it easy to dismiss Trump (aside from pretending he's not saying anything) is that the fraud talk is about how it could have happened. What is needed is a concrete number of votes, entries in the timeseries (or portions of entries), that can be shown to be fraudulent and should be thrown out, which alters the result of the election. The effort then has to be to shift conversation from a blanket "I assume all of that has been debunked" to much-harder-to-evade concrete facts.
Don't get me wrong. My hopes that it would work with the MSM crowd is very low, but such an approach would also makes court cases significantly easier. You don't need to go and prove conspiracy or maliciousness, you just need to prove that entry Z is unclean and it undermines the will of the electorate. The Supreme Court would be amenable to that argument.
Data science experts scrutinize the vote tallies and data from election night across the state of Arizona. Included is the raw data feed for this state, should you like to follow along and review for yourself. https://gofile.io/d/mFNhyr
between the 8th-9th, hundreds of thousands of votes were removed in Queens and Westchester Counties alone.
You know what would be useful here, and it would be easy to make into a tweet and try to get it spread high/wide? A definitive conclusion with hard numbers.
"Subtracting out the fraud we can see, the actual vote tallies for Arizona is Trump X, Biden Y, making Trump the winner. Here's how we got there."
That would get retweeted everywhere.
The thing that makes it easy to dismiss Trump (aside from pretending he's not saying anything) is that the fraud talk is about how it could have happened. What is needed is a concrete number of votes, entries in the timeseries (or portions of entries), that can be shown to be fraudulent and should be thrown out, which alters the result of the election. The effort then has to be to shift conversation from a blanket "I assume all of that has been debunked" to much-harder-to-evade concrete facts.
Don't get me wrong. My hopes that it would work with the MSM crowd is very low, but such an approach would also makes court cases significantly easier. You don't need to go and prove conspiracy or maliciousness, you just need to prove that entry Z is unclean and it undermines the will of the electorate. The Supreme Court would be amenable to that argument.
Thanks for the link
They need to remove the 'Ruby Freeman-Georgia' IG post from the intro of the video... that was not her, clearly.