If true, Lin Wood needs to provide the info to Trumps lawyers who should seek immediate SCOTUS review of this material - Roberts at a minimum should have recused himself from any election based cases.
Yes.. And I doubt Lin Wood is posting this without evidence. He is too precise also - 8/19, justice Breyer. They could sue him both and it would be end immediately. You should ask, why nobody sues him right now. Kemp etc...
This is because it could force discovery on the defendant. In order to prove their innocence in the claim they would have to open themselves up for discovery.
Obviously these people have SOMETHING to hide, but they can always hide behind plausible deniability.
It's just the way the law works. Individuals would have an easy time ducking this.
The real question is why hasnt dominion sued them? What could even be found in discovery for their company? The tweets about them are harmful financially. So why not sue those damaging you?
IMO, Lin is fishing for more evidence - he knows who is corrupt but can't prove it. I feel like he is hoping for discovery. Regardless, it will rattle these people and they will make mistakes. So even if he is just blowing smoke it might uncover something bigger.
I think this has been his strategy all along. He's taunting them. He knows that even if his claims are outlandish, it would lead to discovery if any legal action was taken. The guy is a libel law genius. No way he's setting himself up. He's setting the others up. I know this is true because there's no way these guys would allow him to speak out unless there's a shred of evidence that might get exposed.
Lin Wood is an expert at defamation law. You would think those he is attacking would be suing him, if the information was false. Maybe MAGA patriots in the NSA are leaking stuff to him. I dunno, but something is definitely brewing.
I think he may be firing a warning shot, or trying to give some nerve to Barrett, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, as Sydney Powells case is now on the SCOTUS docket
I suspect it is because of much bigger revelation of all things in certain moment. It is strategic to hold information in secrecy. You can´t sue 1 person for something and let other 50 run. I think Roberts is part of something bigger. (lolita Island) It is few weeks Lin posted something about satanist and pedophiles. They were pretty emotional with Sidney at that time. I think it is because someone from Trump told them and it was hard to process for them.
LOL Imagine...evidence so damning comes out that them two must resign next week. Trump must appoint new justices ASAP, no waiting. Trump replaces fives SCOTUS justices in his first term. The majority of the court. The left cries so so hard. LOL. Legacy. cemented.
Something is going on where Justices are being kept from OK'ing the hearing of cases -the Texas/Cruz case is rock-solid, the manner in which a State conducts it's federal election is determined by that state's legislature.
When this is abrogated and not adhered to, other states are affected and have a right to tell that state to actually do as the Constitution says.
We might need a Constitutional amendment that courts cannot use "standing" as a legal device not to hear cases - it's already a fictitious word and has no meaning in jurisprudence, so we need to make it official and just do away with the fantasy that some people don't have "standing".
If true, Lin Wood needs to provide the info to Trumps lawyers who should seek immediate SCOTUS review of this material - Roberts at a minimum should have recused himself from any election based cases.
You think Lin Wood knows this and Trump's lawyers don't? You have to be crazy to think Lin Wood is ahead of the game. He's the trumpeter.
Yes.. And I doubt Lin Wood is posting this without evidence. He is too precise also - 8/19, justice Breyer. They could sue him both and it would be end immediately. You should ask, why nobody sues him right now. Kemp etc...
This is because it could force discovery on the defendant. In order to prove their innocence in the claim they would have to open themselves up for discovery.
Obviously these people have SOMETHING to hide, but they can always hide behind plausible deniability.
It's just the way the law works. Individuals would have an easy time ducking this.
The real question is why hasnt dominion sued them? What could even be found in discovery for their company? The tweets about them are harmful financially. So why not sue those damaging you?
8/10/19 Epstein didn't kill himself
Trump needs to trigger the sedition act now. if hte chief justices is involved in this steal we have real problems!
IMO, Lin is fishing for more evidence - he knows who is corrupt but can't prove it. I feel like he is hoping for discovery. Regardless, it will rattle these people and they will make mistakes. So even if he is just blowing smoke it might uncover something bigger.
I think this has been his strategy all along. He's taunting them. He knows that even if his claims are outlandish, it would lead to discovery if any legal action was taken. The guy is a libel law genius. No way he's setting himself up. He's setting the others up. I know this is true because there's no way these guys would allow him to speak out unless there's a shred of evidence that might get exposed.
Lin Wood is an expert at defamation law. You would think those he is attacking would be suing him, if the information was false. Maybe MAGA patriots in the NSA are leaking stuff to him. I dunno, but something is definitely brewing.
I think Lin is used to leak information to prepare the public opinion for what's coming.
You got that right.
I do love me some sound logical assessments
tru tru
That 8/19 bothers me though...August 19th (of what year?) or August of 2019?
August of 2019
Wood is trying them in the Court of Public Opinion. Strategy has been used on conservatives way too often, so turnabout is fair play.
does lin have a case pending at SCOTUS? He may have muddied the waters a little bit.
I think he may be firing a warning shot, or trying to give some nerve to Barrett, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, as Sydney Powells case is now on the SCOTUS docket
Well said.
We shouldn't assume anything accept prudence. I haven't really seen evidence that lin and trump are working together in any capacity.
He's the laser pointer. For the cats.
"The documentation of my claims about Justices Roberts & Breyer has been placed in hands of several third parties.
When one cannot attack message, all too often messenger is attacked.
But TRUTH cannot be denied. It cannot be destroyed. I have made sure of that TRUTH."
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1339659337208250369
Huge, so awesome to hear that!!!!!
So he is saying that if anything happens to him, someone will release it? Why not just release the information now?
I suspect it is because of much bigger revelation of all things in certain moment. It is strategic to hold information in secrecy. You can´t sue 1 person for something and let other 50 run. I think Roberts is part of something bigger. (lolita Island) It is few weeks Lin posted something about satanist and pedophiles. They were pretty emotional with Sidney at that time. I think it is because someone from Trump told them and it was hard to process for them.
What about Breyer?
In another tweet he said both Roberts and Breyer should "resign immediately" https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1339635670017445888?s=20
LOL Imagine...evidence so damning comes out that them two must resign next week. Trump must appoint new justices ASAP, no waiting. Trump replaces fives SCOTUS justices in his first term. The majority of the court. The left cries so so hard. LOL. Legacy. cemented.
Yea, except three cucked out already.
It will happen.
I would love to see the proof of this. This is massive news.
5 scoops!
Something is going on where Justices are being kept from OK'ing the hearing of cases -the Texas/Cruz case is rock-solid, the manner in which a State conducts it's federal election is determined by that state's legislature.
When this is abrogated and not adhered to, other states are affected and have a right to tell that state to actually do as the Constitution says.
We might need a Constitutional amendment that courts cannot use "standing" as a legal device not to hear cases - it's already a fictitious word and has no meaning in jurisprudence, so we need to make it official and just do away with the fantasy that some people don't have "standing".