5204
Comments (423)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-12
williammcfadden -12 points ago +17 / -29

Then the recording is forgotten in two days.

49
Ivleeeg 49 points ago +49 / -0

So? They released the transcript of the trump phone call, didn't they? Why not release this one?

3
GodDamnedEngineer 3 points ago +4 / -1

THIS WOULD BE MUCH BETTER PLAYED IN THE SUPREME COURT WITH HIM SITTING THERE LOOKING LIKE A FOOL.

3
Ivleeeg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure, for kicks it would, but in the end he either said it or he didn't. If he did, it doesn't matter if it comes out now or in the court room. He must recuse. If he didn't, it's a good pressure campaign.

1
petethedragon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get Roberts to recuse himself and increase the odds of getting a favorable ruling. One less liberal justice to deal with.

1
MaverickRobot 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, this would be better changing the discussions on facebook, twitter, gab and parlor to swing to pushing people over their limit. This is not the time to rely on the fucking courts.

28
Ivleeeg 28 points ago +28 / -0

I'm not sure where the idea came from that the public can't see the evidence to use it in court or other proceedings but it's absurd and wrong.

10
Shadilady 10 points ago +10 / -0

I agree. There are too many of us that are watching this across the world. The evidence released won't disappear if it can't be disproven. Just like Hunter Biden bullshit didn't. I think Rudy waited too long on that one.

3
Ivleeeg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Rudy should have been pounding the table in September or August about the hunter laptop.

6
OneBigMaga 6 points ago +9 / -3

It is one thing to keep something quiet so you can use it as a bombshell device, but he literally just told everyone what he has, but won't release it. I get the feeling he is just talking out his ass.... again.

4
Butter_and_Meatloaf 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's the same reason potential jurors are interviewed by both parties' attorneys. They want people who can be impartial. If the jurors have seen the evidence pre-trial then they might already have made up their minds and also been influenced one way or the other by media or other opinions.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except in this case he's already released the story of the evidence, just nothing to back it up.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
5
GlacialSpeed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not by us, we are the news now.