It's the same reason potential jurors are interviewed by both parties' attorneys. They want people who can be impartial. If the jurors have seen the evidence pre-trial then they might already have made up their minds and also been influenced one way or the other by media or other opinions.
It's the same reason potential jurors are interviewed by both parties' attorneys. They want people who can be impartial. If the jurors have seen the evidence pre-trial then they might already have made up their minds and also been influenced one way or the other by media or other opinions.
Except in this case he's already released the story of the evidence, just nothing to back it up.