5204
Comments (423)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
69
NostalgicFuturist 69 points ago +70 / -1

Judging by many comments here (including some of mine) there's a consensus that Roberts is compromised. And in a honeypot/Lolita sort of way. I always thought there was something a little--off--about his looks, both too clean-cut and a little sheepish with a shifty plastered-on smile. He's the only Chief Justice I know of who was such a fluster-bunny he flubbed the simple task of administering the Oath of Office [at Obama's first Inauguration]. Freudian slip-up, since he'd been compromised into breaking his own oath?

I know, these are just impressions and intuitions, but I'm standing by them: there's something seriously wrong with this guy, on many levels.

21
Nimblenavigator1 21 points ago +21 / -0

I suspected as much when he essentially went out of his way to uphold the ACA in Sebelius

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

"It's a tax."

1
Returningtogod 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was the absolute last straw for me. A law that we all KNEW was unconstitutional, and he fucking justified it.

We KNOW this election is unconstitutional.

18
MAGAngelo 18 points ago +18 / -0

Wait, He didn’t take an Oath of office???

4
Pepe2016_ivotedfTD 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe NF is talking about Obama’s flubbed sworn in ceremony.

3
Boruzu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I seem to remember something about him screwing it up, but I can’t remember what it was. It was like a do over. Holy crap.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +3 / -1

I should have been clearer. When he was swearing in Obama for his first term, he flubbed some words in the Oath of Office. Obama actually prompted him with the correct words.

16
deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1
2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, very interesting.

I seem to remember McInerney talking about Hamrr/Scorecard being used to spy on Roberts among others--apparently 150+ other judges. A lot falls into place with this background.

I have my doubts about the photo. Clinton looks like his ghastly pasty saggy present-day self but Roberts looks 20 years younger, and the profile shot makes it even more ambiguous. On the other hand I'm perfectly willing to believe he's been to the island and is generally a dirty scumbag. How often have we ever overestimated the awfulness of these people?

Googling (Ducking) the JFK 57 Memo I came across this:

https://ugetube.com/watch/deep-state-showdown-trump-uses-jfk-national-security-memo-57_yBobgViZNnQpz4L.html

The rambling presentation is annoying as hell but he brings up the hiring of a new "Continuity of Government/Combat Commander" this summer--in charge of NORAD and empowered (apparently) to set up emergency government, (originally in the event of nuclear attack, 80s and 90s.) Also mentions the 9/11 Act, Add Election Interference EO, Insurrection Act and Martial Law and it seems Trump has a pretty big arsenal ready and set to go.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
sometimescanbefunny 3 points ago +4 / -1

No joke - I have no problem with "judging someone" based on any number of factors. There's nothing wrong with being discerning; commies, libbies, and crybabies can go suck a big fat one until they man/woman up!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
William_Wallace 7 points ago +7 / -0

....absolutely spot-on.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0