Something is going on where Justices are being kept from OK'ing the hearing of cases -the Texas/Cruz case is rock-solid, the manner in which a State conducts it's federal election is determined by that state's legislature.
When this is abrogated and not adhered to, other states are affected and have a right to tell that state to actually do as the Constitution says.
We might need a Constitutional amendment that courts cannot use "standing" as a legal device not to hear cases - it's already a fictitious word and has no meaning in jurisprudence, so we need to make it official and just do away with the fantasy that some people don't have "standing".
Something is going on where Justices are being kept from OK'ing the hearing of cases -the Texas/Cruz case is rock-solid, the manner in which a State conducts it's federal election is determined by that state's legislature.
When this is abrogated and not adhered to, other states are affected and have a right to tell that state to actually do as the Constitution says.
We might need a Constitutional amendment that courts cannot use "standing" as a legal device not to hear cases - it's already a fictitious word and has no meaning in jurisprudence, so we need to make it official and just do away with the fantasy that some people don't have "standing".