14
Comments (36)
sorted by:
5
Lars_Lindemann 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are you high?

5
chicago_prisoner 5 points ago +5 / -0

uhhh, not at all.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
TrumpTrollMaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not at all.

3
Steven4385 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have to motivate the vote. I don't think he has conceded

3
macrolinx 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe he 8s referring to holding majority in the senate, regardless of the outcome of Trump.

3
Verrerogo 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. It is just saying we need an umbrella in case it rains.

That doesn't mean we are sure it will rain.

It doesn't mean it is already raining.

It means what it says and nothing more. We need an umbrella, because in life sometimes it rains. And that is true.

Georgia! Listen to the man, and get it done.

You don't want to look back one day and say, "If Only I Had Done XYZ. And I could have. And it wouldn't have been that hard. And I didn't."

2
Wefoundyouremails 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well if Trump is president, he still needs us to to vote for them to keep the Senate majority, so while quoting Joe Biden looks bad, this isn't a concession.

2
emredlark 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ummm, no...

2
sustainable_saltmine 2 points ago +2 / -0

If people aren't actually packing it in, then I don't like talk of people referring to a Biden Administration in the future tense. If Biden has no chance, then don't say things like that second sentence. There's nothing for them to get in the way of from a Biden standpoint if Biden loses, these two Senators would just block shit from the regular Democrat Party and the Squad.

1
Vivere_Pericoloso 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's basically contingent plan if Biden win the cheating..

1
golinveaux 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is already the agenda the Senate has been blocking.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
2
basedBlumpkin [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Try to maintain the emotional maturity level of at least a 12 year old.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-2
Schiffblower -2 points ago +2 / -4

Yes

-5
handpeople -5 points ago +2 / -7

More than likely.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
handpeople 0 points ago +2 / -2

Read it yourself, are you trying to have me believe this is 4D chess.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
handpeople 1 point ago +2 / -1

So why would he say we need to stop the Senate's agenda if Trump could just veto anything they did?

2
Verrerogo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because Trump can't veto everything. And because the Senate is where impeachment is decided. We only have Trump today, because we had the Senate when he was impeached. There could easily be another impeachment in Trump's second term. THAT is one reason we need every Rep Senator. Not that they are so great but that a Dem is SURE to vote against Trump. A Dem HAS TO. Anything is better than that certainty.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

He basically said, we need 2 GOP senators to get in the way of President Joe Biden. Read it.

2
basedBlumpkin [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pointing that out really angers people here.

There are a ton of ways you can frame your argument for voting against radical senators in GA, one of them should not be using a Biden admin as the reason while we're in the middle of the fight of our lives to stop an election from being stolen.

1
Verrerogo 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said, we need 2 GOP senators in case we have to survive a President Joe Biden. That is a reasonable thing to say.

He did not mention the horrible problems a Dem Senate will give Trump in his second term. That would be more speculative. What he did say is not speculative. Biden has indeed endorsed all the horrible things Pence listed.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he knows, why would he say Joe Biden said he doesn't need 2 senators to get in the way, and then say WE NEED 2 senators to get in the way? Get in the who's way?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0