Not at all surprising. I'm curious to know the actual rate of adverse effects though. I don't understand how this drug can be approved without published data on safety and efficacy.
Anaphylactic shock as possible with all vaccines in rare cases... It's also possible with all medications and also all foods and pretty much anything else on this planet.....
It's literally just an allergic reaction which can happen to anyone at any time in regards to anything...
It is 100% expected in very rare cases with any vaccine, no matter the type.
Probably better to find something to bitch about besides something that was 100% expected to happen in rare cases.
I have some bad news for you. Our immune system cells find and sample pathogens in our blood. When they find one (oversimplified) they take a sample of it, mark it and killer cells kill it. The immune system has now learned a new pathogen and will fight it off next time much more quickly and have more cells ready to go. That is exactly how it is supposed to work.
Immune systems aren't perfect and you could be getting more sensitive to each exposure and eventually have an anaphylactic reaction; or you could have one the first time you encountered something--sometimes it be like that.
All vaccines "teach" your body to recognize a natural pathogen via a very small sample, often a dead sample. That's all it needs.
Thanks, Professor, for explaining how traditional vaccines work. But this vaccine is not "teaching" your body to recognize a natural pathogen via a very small sample of that pathogen.
This is from the CDC:
"To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies.Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies."
The end result in either scenario is fundamentally the same.
A lot of our vaccines don't contain a live or dead virus, but instead use antigens (proteins) from that virus that produce a strong immune response. The result is that when we encounter the virus itself in the wild, our immune system recognizes those proteins and mounts a response. The theory behind mRNA vaccines is very similar. Whether it's safe or effective is a different question altogether.
Are you a Phoenix professor? Your reading comprehension is sub-par.
The new vaccine is not a small sample of the virus.
It prompts your cells to make a piece of what is called “spike protein.” The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19. Your body then kills that.
Don't care how it kills a particular virus. Still the same principle. Your body only ever samples small samples of viruses, not the whole thing. The CTLs kill what they're told to kill. You are making a distinction without a difference here.
Pray tell how it "prompts your cells to make a piece of..." is any different from what I've said.
Not at all surprising. I'm curious to know the actual rate of adverse effects though. I don't understand how this drug can be approved without published data on safety and efficacy.
The quote about how mRNA vaccines work is from the CDC.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Anaphylactic shock as possible with all vaccines in rare cases... It's also possible with all medications and also all foods and pretty much anything else on this planet.....
It's literally just an allergic reaction which can happen to anyone at any time in regards to anything...
It is 100% expected in very rare cases with any vaccine, no matter the type.
Probably better to find something to bitch about besides something that was 100% expected to happen in rare cases.
So, > trust the plan
of the MSM and Fauci.
I have some bad news for you. Our immune system cells find and sample pathogens in our blood. When they find one (oversimplified) they take a sample of it, mark it and killer cells kill it. The immune system has now learned a new pathogen and will fight it off next time much more quickly and have more cells ready to go. That is exactly how it is supposed to work.
Immune systems aren't perfect and you could be getting more sensitive to each exposure and eventually have an anaphylactic reaction; or you could have one the first time you encountered something--sometimes it be like that.
All vaccines "teach" your body to recognize a natural pathogen via a very small sample, often a dead sample. That's all it needs.
Thanks, Professor, for explaining how traditional vaccines work. But this vaccine is not "teaching" your body to recognize a natural pathogen via a very small sample of that pathogen.
This is from the CDC:
"To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies.Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies."
The end result in either scenario is fundamentally the same.
A lot of our vaccines don't contain a live or dead virus, but instead use antigens (proteins) from that virus that produce a strong immune response. The result is that when we encounter the virus itself in the wild, our immune system recognizes those proteins and mounts a response. The theory behind mRNA vaccines is very similar. Whether it's safe or effective is a different question altogether.
THEY ARE ALWAYS SMALL SAMPLES, ALL THE WAY BACK TO PASTEUR. SO YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM CAN EASILY KILL IT AND THERE'S NOT SO MUCH IT COIULD KILL YOU.
All I have left is a puppet show. Should I get the puppets?
Are you a Phoenix professor? Your reading comprehension is sub-par.
The new vaccine is not a small sample of the virus.
It prompts your cells to make a piece of what is called “spike protein.” The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19. Your body then kills that.
Don't care how it kills a particular virus. Still the same principle. Your body only ever samples small samples of viruses, not the whole thing. The CTLs kill what they're told to kill. You are making a distinction without a difference here. Pray tell how it "prompts your cells to make a piece of..." is any different from what I've said.
Bingo.
Thanks. I hope it was clear.