378
posted ago by ValkyrieHoneybadger ago by ValkyrieHoneybadger +378 / -0

99.9% of people under 70 survive COVID. No different than the flu.

The longer you play the game, the longer the game goes on.

Fuck masks and fuck vaccines.

Comments (28)
sorted by:
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
ValkyrieHoneybadger [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes.they.do

6
NamelessKing 6 points ago +6 / -0

they want money and they want ppl dead and more fear spreaded out and more control.

5
ManUp 5 points ago +5 / -0

Control, not health and safety.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
BlancheNegre 3 points ago +6 / -3

It's easier to control the public with lockdowns and mask mandates. Oh, and big businesses like Amazon, Zoom, all sorts of social media, big box stores, Uber, chain restaurants are making record gains. They want to keep this up as long as possible.

3
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because viral pneumonia misdiagnosed as COVID is a healthy cash cow, that's why. BIGOT!

2
ValkyrieHoneybadger [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya know...Ivermectin cures all viruses.

Yet you some.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MAGALogic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Money.

The sheep are manipulated while the wolves come out to feast.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's about control. It was never about the virus.

1
Ayn_Rand 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm 100% on team trump, but as a healthcare professional, I'll say masks generally do "work" Covid is spread through droplets, the mask stops the droplet from landing somewhere it can infect people.

Google Droplet Precautions. This is why it's even more horrifying that fauci was initially against masks. we know how viruses is spread. There is a legitmiate debate on surgical vs N95, but regardless masks are helpful, so why was fauci not recommending them?

1
ValkyrieHoneybadger [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Masks do not work for the micron size of COVID.

N95 is not even good enough and its just a petri dish on your face. As you breathe the hot air onto the mask it wicks the COVID into your mask mouth.

But 99.9% of the people under 70 survive COVID. For the .01% there is Ivermectin and HCQ.

1
Ayn_Rand 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are completely wrong, it's the opposite. N95 is not necessary because small particles will not cause the virus to be transmitted. COVID requires droplet precautions which would call for a regular surgical mask (or any face covering really)

1
ValkyrieHoneybadger [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. You are missing completely the micron size of COVID.

COVID sits on the front of your mask. Your hot moist breath causes it to wick through the front of the N95 mask and then to interior of your mask and you get it on your skin around your mouth and then ingest it.

Surgical masks are useless. In fact they are meant for surgical setting only and they are to prevent transmission from staff to patient in surgical setting only. They are not meant to prevent virus transmission between people for hours and days on end in unsterile settings.

The best prevention is HCQ, Ivermectin and a strong immune system to build antibodies.

https://nypost.com/2020/12/16/wearing-a-used-mask-could-worse-than-no-mask-amid-covid-19-study/

1
Ayn_Rand 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're conflating the size of covid with R0. look into it.

1
ValkyrieHoneybadger [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope.

I do this shit for a living.

NBC warfare officer, Industrial Hygienist and Vaxx QAQC Manager for Big Pharma in Denmark.

The micron size of COVID is too small for the micron size of all masks except HEPA.

Because COVID is persistent in most surfaces in the environment, droplets land on the exterior of a mask and your hot moist breath wicks it to the interior of your mask and you ingest.

Hey...riddle me this: what kind of PPE is worn by people working with COVID in military research labs? Does it involve positive pressure mask device?

Why do you think a N95 PARTICULATE or a surgical mask will protect anyone?

Why continue to insist on masks when FDA approved cures are available?

1
Ayn_Rand 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was planning on becoming an industrial hygienist. Good stuff. I'm a bit confused by what exactly you mean. COVID is small, but aerosolized particles do not contain enough of the virus to transmit it, hence why no one really mentions N95 any more.

Is this incorrect? I don't know how things are done in Denmark, but in the states we have 3 distinctions regarding public health and infectious viruses. Contact precautions, Droplet precautions, & Airborne precautions. (Airborne is colloquial, it really refers to aerosolized particles as far as virology is concerned.)

1
ValkyrieHoneybadger [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please confirm your rationale for a mask (surgical or cloth). Are you saying for droplet precautions? If yes, then than COVID filled droplet sits on the front of the mask for hours, lives up to 72 hours under ambient temperature and your moist warm breath wicks it to the other side of the porous medical mask or cloth. Add to that people touch the mask with bare hands and never change or wash them enough...they end up being a petri dish and increase transmission from improper use. Masks are a very short term solution and not for every day use for months on end for a persistent virus.

N95 masks were never developed for aerosols. They are particulate only (a virus is not a particulate in the mask world) and are 95% effective. The micron size and material of a N95 is only for solid particulate up to a specified micron size of solid particle.

The best approach is cure and prevention with HCQ and Ivermectin. It reduces the virus impact to nothing quickly and therefore transmission as well. You significantly reduce healthcare burden. Cheaper and effective.

1
TAIWANNUMBERONE 1 point ago +1 / -0

China doesn't manufacture HCQ at a 10000% markup.