The Supreme Court is giving the states a month to respond - until January 14th! He’s trying to run out the clock - To hear the matter just before Inauguration Day (or afterwards). The country is a tinderbox and he’s playing with fire.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You're right. We win them
Dride is a truth teller. When he speaks, listen carefully. Very carefully.
We use the system in place. If and when that system fails to produce justice and all options are exhausted, that is when we move to the last box.
Exactly. Antifa may be faggots, but they get their hands dirty and will burn down a city. Trump supporters won’t bust a damn grape let alone a round.
Killing others is the last resort for us.
Which many mistake for “we’ll never do it!”
We just hope we don’t have to.
God willing.
Amen. Godspeed President Trump.
Never say never. There are only two paths for this election: justice and oblivion.
What's easy isn't always right, what's right isn't always easy.
These justices are supposed to be exemplars - the best among us. Now I consider many of them to be on equal footing to deranged meth-addicted partisans (wow I accidentally just described Antifa).
ACB is weak.she was crying for George Floyd and she did not support trump.
From a WND Article....
"Standing is not mentioned in the Constitution nor in any legislation governing the federal courts. The Constitution authorizes federal courts to decide "all cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this U.S. Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority." [Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution (emphasis added).] Article III, Section 2, refers to "controversies" but only for diversity cases that are not brought under federal or constitutional laws.
The U.S. Supreme Court conjured "standing" out of thin air, talking about a case and controversy – not case or controversy. They invented inconsistent, self-contradictory and illogical "rules." That's yet another way they can pick and choose policy outcomes while pretending to follow objective standards."
Standing used to mean something but like everything else corruption touches it becomes corrupt. It's now become an excuse to arbitrarily dismiss any case they feel like.
In an election like this nearly everyone has standing. They're trying to minimise that as though it's between a very narrow set of competing parties.
This in itself starts to raise certain issues. If a state doesn't have standing in a matter that impacts the united states (not united state) to which they are supposed to be a party then it means it is not a united state just a state. It would also mean that anything federal has no standing in that state. That would make it defacto an independent state. It would also immediately mean that the president of the united states is not their president. He would not have standing in their state just as their state would not have standing with the united states. It would also mean that SCOTUS has no standing in their state.
We need a million people marching and protesting in DC. A few thousand will not get it done.
I was thinking about a continuous presence until the inauguration.bif we could keep a few thousand out daily, to let them know we will be there on more than Saturday when we get off work
The country will never unite around Biden. It will only get worse. And it will get bloody.
The more they see of this Chinese puppet, the more that they will wake up to the fact that this was a CCP coup.
That is why Trump needs to end it now.
There are millions of dummies that do not realize what they have voted for.
Polls are now showing that people would not have voted for Biden had they known about Biden Crime Family. The media totally suppressed that story.
The People do not want to go on the road to Communism.
Peace through strength. Mercy through overwhelming force.
In this case I think mercy would be a mistake
Roberts wants us to use the 4th box. Let's go.
Recall that tomorrow is when the executive order is potentially kicking in, after the DNI report.
How do you do, fellow millipede? I don't understand, what exactly are you suggesting we do?
Kek
He is a traitor and shall be dealt with as such.
To be honest I don't believe yet this supposed staffer on 4chan. Looks like a larper to me. As far as I am concerned nobody knows what went down in the SC.
What Roberts was screaming
I volunteer for the job of executioner. I practice with sandbags and tune my drop floor daily. I have hoods in 3 differant sizes. I prefer you dress in an adult diaper so as to not deal with the shittier side of my work.
Wee can't interrupt his vacation in Malta can we? Can we hold off on the revolution until the Malta thing is resolved guys?
What did I miss with justice Roberts?
He makes me feel like the right should be rooting, too. I'm not inviting violence, I'm just saying that with him it seems the squeaky wheel gets the grease. It's bullshit.
Justices can be impeached... Just sayin.
A justice deferred is a justice denied.
First rule of law: might makes right. Laws don't mean anything if you can't enforce them.