818
Comments (85)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
Slavik777 15 points ago +15 / -0

If Texas doesnt rely on SCOTUS anymore, it will sure help. Another point to consider is, having a whole state and then others joining in, will sure make SCOTUS take another fucking gander at what they are really afraid of.

7
christosgnosis 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, it shows how stupid Roberts is to use the excuse of caving the rule of law to BLM rioting

When the actual consequence of the SCOTUS shutting down access to redress of grievance to a state - when the Constitution is fundamentally a contract between the union compact of states and the Supreme Court is the only court for states to seek redress per misdeeds of other parties to the contract

could be a splintering of the union compact - many of those states that agreed with Texas might very well join its exit and form a new republic

no one in their right mind would want to submit to an obvious illegitimate presidency, where it's candidate is a patsy for the CCP, and its platform is hell bent on the dismantling of the republic to install Venezuela-style shithole communism

3
Isolated_Patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depends on how many state go. Without Texas the US ends up perma-blue*.

*Based on known voting patterns that are probably fake.