That's what pol is full of and a lot of it is going on here too. Posting clickbait porn for updoots is really doing the MAGA movement a disservice. The things that stick are $$$ and actions shortly after $$$ is sent. Spreading half truths and exaggerating every story into being a HAPPENING(tm) is what Alex Jones does so let's leave that to him
Yeah, lots of people hate the data not having excellent sources and be completely thought out, but I like it. It shows that people are searching the data out. Sometimes it is wrong but a lot of times it is right. And we are just a forum we don't have to be perfect. And we have lots and lots of anal people running around correcting us on every thing we get wrong and sometimes they are wrong.
I remember all the people complaining about the vote paper having some sort of identifier that would identify vote paper that was photocopied. And you were downvoted for saying that it could be true. And then we saw a person submitted an affidavit where part of the vote was shaded because it was photocopied and the image didn't photocopy correctly.
So honestly, feel free to correct people. But I am okay with new data coming out that is not perfect.
Justice Roberts wasn’t on the lolita. Thats a false end. https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/
This should be required reading and Wood should read it himself. I’m tired of chasing false leads and focusing in the wrong directions.
That's what pol is full of and a lot of it is going on here too. Posting clickbait porn for updoots is really doing the MAGA movement a disservice. The things that stick are $$$ and actions shortly after $$$ is sent. Spreading half truths and exaggerating every story into being a HAPPENING(tm) is what Alex Jones does so let's leave that to him
And hannity
Yeah, lots of people hate the data not having excellent sources and be completely thought out, but I like it. It shows that people are searching the data out. Sometimes it is wrong but a lot of times it is right. And we are just a forum we don't have to be perfect. And we have lots and lots of anal people running around correcting us on every thing we get wrong and sometimes they are wrong.
I remember all the people complaining about the vote paper having some sort of identifier that would identify vote paper that was photocopied. And you were downvoted for saying that it could be true. And then we saw a person submitted an affidavit where part of the vote was shaded because it was photocopied and the image didn't photocopy correctly.
So honestly, feel free to correct people. But I am okay with new data coming out that is not perfect.
He wasn't on epsteins plane thats why
That other one was a pilot log of some kind
So that entry was on a different plane not owned by epstein
There's a very long post on here about it with pretty good detail
Good link
Hmmm, not convinced.