Yeah, lots of people hate the data not having excellent sources and be completely thought out, but I like it. It shows that people are searching the data out. Sometimes it is wrong but a lot of times it is right. And we are just a forum we don't have to be perfect. And we have lots and lots of anal people running around correcting us on every thing we get wrong and sometimes they are wrong.

I remember all the people complaining about the vote paper having some sort of identifier that would identify vote paper that was photocopied. And you were downvoted for saying that it could be true. And then we saw a person submitted an affidavit where part of the vote was shaded because it was photocopied and the image didn't photocopy correctly.

So honestly, feel free to correct people. But I am okay with new data coming out that is not perfect.