111
posted ago by Kriegson +111 / -0

Why would these be enabled and allowed, multiple times, with armed guards, barriers and no negative press? Consider the reasons why they would want you to dismiss and ignore these zones after the first one proved such an embarrassing failure, then make more of them.

Comments (5)
sorted by:
7
BajoPivljanin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Looks like Sarajevo in 1992, when Serbs and Muslims entrenched their parts of town or Vukovar 1991, when Serbs and Croats started enclosing themselves.

Barricades, zones and other sheets are not normal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serb_Autonomous_Regions

6
DrinkTeaNotKoolaid 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good question, not sure I have a good answer professor but I’ll give it a try;

European style “no go” zones for Sharia Law except not seeing a lot of Muslims in Portland or Seattle

Establishes idea of secession in the public psyche

In the left it promotes the idea that political police are needed

6
the-new-style 6 points ago +6 / -0

To show you who's boss.

Imagine setting up a Patriots Only Zone and see how quick that would be crushed

1
JamesSunderland 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Dems are afraid of the Cringe Fringe.

1
random1999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone involved should be in prison.