Yea, I looked it up as well. That gives the president military power to enforce legislation (which afaik still has to be passed by congress) so it doesn't allow him to be a dictator unless you are using the leftist definition which is anyone who enforces any law at all
Sure, so he could use that article to use the military to enforce the law to hold the responsible parties accountable. Once again idk what this has to do with dictatorship, which is what I have asked twice now? That article doesn't allow him to use the military to do whatever the hell he wants and doesn't give him absolute power as in a dictatorship. Unless, like I mentioned before, you're talking about leftist definition of dictatorship
How so? Who's definition of dictator, ours or the lefts?
Yea, I looked it up as well. That gives the president military power to enforce legislation (which afaik still has to be passed by congress) so it doesn't allow him to be a dictator unless you are using the leftist definition which is anyone who enforces any law at all
Sure, so he could use that article to use the military to enforce the law to hold the responsible parties accountable. Once again idk what this has to do with dictatorship, which is what I have asked twice now? That article doesn't allow him to use the military to do whatever the hell he wants and doesn't give him absolute power as in a dictatorship. Unless, like I mentioned before, you're talking about leftist definition of dictatorship