The classic non answer, answer. Again, it's not the accomplishment that's the issue. The issue is whether or not this virus, whom even POTUS has repeatedly stated as being overblown, requires a vaccine being coerced into the population. It's easy to back POTUS on everything he does generally cause we can see the opposite side as corrupt, lying scum bags. This particular topic is a bit more complex and for you to summarize it as an accomplishment therefore it's okay to be coerced into jabbing it into your arms ( unconstitutionally) and even going against the Nuremberg laws, shows your lack of awareness or caring for that matter.
I think you're the one that needs to open your eyes. We either have a constitution that covers us under all circumstances or we don't. It doesn't ONLY apply to what POTUS says.
You also need to learn to read a little better, or put your glasses on, because you're accusing me of saying things I never said. I never advocated for or against a vaccine, but merely pointed out the fact that it is a marvel that they developed one quickly, utilizing multiple industries to make it happen. The virus itself is a completely separate issue, along with the response by the government which is yet another issue itself. So, if you want to discuss these 'complex' issues, we can, because they can easily be separated, although I'd hazard a guess that it might be too complex for you to comprehend. My original point had nothing to do with the rollout of the vaccine and who benefits from it, and whether or not someone should take it; they're all separate issues. If you choose not to take it, that's your issue. If others choose to or not to take it, that's not your issue. Your body, your choice. Their body, their choice. If you want to complain about Gates benefitting from it, ok. It's not an issue I really care about. I don't believe anyone should be coerced into doing something they don't want to do. Furthermore, you have your facts wrong (not surprising), because the Nuremburg Laws are much different than the Nuremburg Code (which likely you're referencing). I also would never agree to forcing anybody to take something they don't want. If they feel it necessary to take the vaccine, that's on them, not me. Finally, you can disagree on my points, but don't try and make arguments with me that I didn't make, because believe me, if I wanted to make them I very well would have.
I think the real problem here lies in the fact that you didn't understand the post at all. I asked every specifically how it's supposed to help us resist leftist corporations, who as you know, will coerce everybody along with the corrupt at all levels of government into forcing you to get the vaccine one way or another.
If you think this is going to be an issue of "my body, my choice", you sir are an idiot. If it was as simple as "my body my choice", people wouldn't be concerned in the slightest about the vaccine. It would be as relevant as a seasonal flu shot.
I was referring to Gates as an example of who is the biggest pusher of the vaccine. A man who is deeply involved with every major crook on this planet. A man who's foundation was heavily involved in the simulation of a pandemic in October 2019. A man who's involved in the WEC and even the wuhan lab.
If your original post was to simply respond to the title and not the comment, then fair. But you didn't need to write some bullshit about anything else. You're living in lala land with the "your choice" bullshit. That or you live in a small town and have no clue what's going on in the big cities.
If you can't understand why I brought up gates, the vaccine and trump's push all in the same post/comments, you're fucking stupid. Plain and simple.
Yea, so number 1), Gates was irrelevant to my original point. Number 2) on an individual level, it does come down to personal choice, and if and when I'm wrong on that, I'll be the first one to grovel at your feet admitting that I was wrong. 3) I actually did answer your question, but you didn't like my response. You asked why POTUS was pushing the vaccine so hard, and how it's supposed to help us resist 'corporate fucks'. I answered your post on why he was pushing it. Disagree all you want, but that was my answer in response to your question. You want a different answer, ask a different question, genius. 3) Apparently, you need to go back and read your own post (what is it with you and reading, anyway?) because the comment I responded to, was your post; you didn't have anything other than "title says it all". I didn't respond to another comment you made, I responded to the general conversation. Again, answering the question you posed. 5) If I wanted to individually comment on something you had said as an aside, I would have. 6) Don't insinuate arguments I haven't made. I didn't comment against standing up to the big corporations trope because it's a dumb argument in this specific case. It presumes that a small biopharm would have had the capacity to do it all themselves. 7) Gates is pushing one of the several variants of vaccines, if I recall correctly. It might be the moderna vaccine, but I don't remember, nor care. There are several other vaccines not necessarily affiliated with Gates. 8) If you're concerned about people being forced to take the vaccine, write a post that reflects that. I simply responded to your post, because that's what one does. 9) the government is not going to force me to do anything I don't want to do, you can rest-assured that. Perhaps you, but not me. 9) HIPPA. Read up on it. 10) You're trying to argue with me on points which I'm not interested in arguing about. I may even agree, but again, those are arguments outside my original point. Maybe you should learn to code
The classic non answer, answer. Again, it's not the accomplishment that's the issue. The issue is whether or not this virus, whom even POTUS has repeatedly stated as being overblown, requires a vaccine being coerced into the population. It's easy to back POTUS on everything he does generally cause we can see the opposite side as corrupt, lying scum bags. This particular topic is a bit more complex and for you to summarize it as an accomplishment therefore it's okay to be coerced into jabbing it into your arms ( unconstitutionally) and even going against the Nuremberg laws, shows your lack of awareness or caring for that matter.
I think you're the one that needs to open your eyes. We either have a constitution that covers us under all circumstances or we don't. It doesn't ONLY apply to what POTUS says.
You also need to learn to read a little better, or put your glasses on, because you're accusing me of saying things I never said. I never advocated for or against a vaccine, but merely pointed out the fact that it is a marvel that they developed one quickly, utilizing multiple industries to make it happen. The virus itself is a completely separate issue, along with the response by the government which is yet another issue itself. So, if you want to discuss these 'complex' issues, we can, because they can easily be separated, although I'd hazard a guess that it might be too complex for you to comprehend. My original point had nothing to do with the rollout of the vaccine and who benefits from it, and whether or not someone should take it; they're all separate issues. If you choose not to take it, that's your issue. If others choose to or not to take it, that's not your issue. Your body, your choice. Their body, their choice. If you want to complain about Gates benefitting from it, ok. It's not an issue I really care about. I don't believe anyone should be coerced into doing something they don't want to do. Furthermore, you have your facts wrong (not surprising), because the Nuremburg Laws are much different than the Nuremburg Code (which likely you're referencing). I also would never agree to forcing anybody to take something they don't want. If they feel it necessary to take the vaccine, that's on them, not me. Finally, you can disagree on my points, but don't try and make arguments with me that I didn't make, because believe me, if I wanted to make them I very well would have.
I think the real problem here lies in the fact that you didn't understand the post at all. I asked every specifically how it's supposed to help us resist leftist corporations, who as you know, will coerce everybody along with the corrupt at all levels of government into forcing you to get the vaccine one way or another.
If you think this is going to be an issue of "my body, my choice", you sir are an idiot. If it was as simple as "my body my choice", people wouldn't be concerned in the slightest about the vaccine. It would be as relevant as a seasonal flu shot.
I was referring to Gates as an example of who is the biggest pusher of the vaccine. A man who is deeply involved with every major crook on this planet. A man who's foundation was heavily involved in the simulation of a pandemic in October 2019. A man who's involved in the WEC and even the wuhan lab.
If your original post was to simply respond to the title and not the comment, then fair. But you didn't need to write some bullshit about anything else. You're living in lala land with the "your choice" bullshit. That or you live in a small town and have no clue what's going on in the big cities.
If you can't understand why I brought up gates, the vaccine and trump's push all in the same post/comments, you're fucking stupid. Plain and simple.
Yea, so number 1), Gates was irrelevant to my original point. Number 2) on an individual level, it does come down to personal choice, and if and when I'm wrong on that, I'll be the first one to grovel at your feet admitting that I was wrong. 3) I actually did answer your question, but you didn't like my response. You asked why POTUS was pushing the vaccine so hard, and how it's supposed to help us resist 'corporate fucks'. I answered your post on why he was pushing it. Disagree all you want, but that was my answer in response to your question. You want a different answer, ask a different question, genius. 3) Apparently, you need to go back and read your own post (what is it with you and reading, anyway?) because the comment I responded to, was your post; you didn't have anything other than "title says it all". I didn't respond to another comment you made, I responded to the general conversation. Again, answering the question you posed. 5) If I wanted to individually comment on something you had said as an aside, I would have. 6) Don't insinuate arguments I haven't made. I didn't comment against standing up to the big corporations trope because it's a dumb argument in this specific case. It presumes that a small biopharm would have had the capacity to do it all themselves. 7) Gates is pushing one of the several variants of vaccines, if I recall correctly. It might be the moderna vaccine, but I don't remember, nor care. There are several other vaccines not necessarily affiliated with Gates. 8) If you're concerned about people being forced to take the vaccine, write a post that reflects that. I simply responded to your post, because that's what one does. 9) the government is not going to force me to do anything I don't want to do, you can rest-assured that. Perhaps you, but not me. 9) HIPPA. Read up on it. 10) You're trying to argue with me on points which I'm not interested in arguing about. I may even agree, but again, those are arguments outside my original point. Maybe you should learn to code