Yea, so number 1), Gates was irrelevant to my original point. Number 2) on an individual level, it does come down to personal choice, and if and when I'm wrong on that, I'll be the first one to grovel at your feet admitting that I was wrong. 3) I actually did answer your question, but you didn't like my response. You asked why POTUS was pushing the vaccine so hard, and how it's supposed to help us resist 'corporate fucks'. I answered your post on why he was pushing it. Disagree all you want, but that was my answer in response to your question. You want a different answer, ask a different question, genius. 3) Apparently, you need to go back and read your own post (what is it with you and reading, anyway?) because the comment I responded to, was your post; you didn't have anything other than "title says it all". I didn't respond to another comment you made, I responded to the general conversation. Again, answering the question you posed. 5) If I wanted to individually comment on something you had said as an aside, I would have. 6) Don't insinuate arguments I haven't made. I didn't comment against standing up to the big corporations trope because it's a dumb argument in this specific case. It presumes that a small biopharm would have had the capacity to do it all themselves. 7) Gates is pushing one of the several variants of vaccines, if I recall correctly. It might be the moderna vaccine, but I don't remember, nor care. There are several other vaccines not necessarily affiliated with Gates. 8) If you're concerned about people being forced to take the vaccine, write a post that reflects that. I simply responded to your post, because that's what one does. 9) the government is not going to force me to do anything I don't want to do, you can rest-assured that. Perhaps you, but not me. 9) HIPPA. Read up on it. 10) You're trying to argue with me on points which I'm not interested in arguing about. I may even agree, but again, those are arguments outside my original point. Maybe you should learn to code
Yea, so number 1), Gates was irrelevant to my original point. Number 2) on an individual level, it does come down to personal choice, and if and when I'm wrong on that, I'll be the first one to grovel at your feet admitting that I was wrong. 3) I actually did answer your question, but you didn't like my response. You asked why POTUS was pushing the vaccine so hard, and how it's supposed to help us resist 'corporate fucks'. I answered your post on why he was pushing it. Disagree all you want, but that was my answer in response to your question. You want a different answer, ask a different question, genius. 3) Apparently, you need to go back and read your own post (what is it with you and reading, anyway?) because the comment I responded to, was your post; you didn't have anything other than "title says it all". I didn't respond to another comment you made, I responded to the general conversation. Again, answering the question you posed. 5) If I wanted to individually comment on something you had said as an aside, I would have. 6) Don't insinuate arguments I haven't made. I didn't comment against standing up to the big corporations trope because it's a dumb argument in this specific case. It presumes that a small biopharm would have had the capacity to do it all themselves. 7) Gates is pushing one of the several variants of vaccines, if I recall correctly. It might be the moderna vaccine, but I don't remember, nor care. There are several other vaccines not necessarily affiliated with Gates. 8) If you're concerned about people being forced to take the vaccine, write a post that reflects that. I simply responded to your post, because that's what one does. 9) the government is not going to force me to do anything I don't want to do, you can rest-assured that. Perhaps you, but not me. 9) HIPPA. Read up on it. 10) You're trying to argue with me on points which I'm not interested in arguing about. I may even agree, but again, those are arguments outside my original point. Maybe you should learn to code