26
posted ago by KGB82 ago by KGB82 +27 / -1

Just an offer to anyone, and I'm willing to go the distance with anyone in an earnest discussion.

Comments (83)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
KGB82 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, I'm not trying to proselytize you to "my religion." What I'm referring to is, specifically, that the affirmation of your self, which is non-material (and of which we can expound on more if that is the right direction), is also the realization that a Godhead is an absolute predicate. And I say this comes very early, though we don't understand it fully immediately. It's something I've spent a good amount of time on, and I don't think people trust themselves about it.

2
swampB22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Go ahead and present your argument. I’ve studied theology (recreational) for well over 20 years.

2
KGB82 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

The argument? I would say, there is a Godhead. I assert all of the following ad hoc, but I can break each down according to wherever you take it.

There is a self. (An assumption.) If there is no self, I cannot affirm or deny anything. I have already affirmed this. If I don't affirm this, I can not know anything. (Another affirmation - contradicting refusal to affirm knowing.) The self is self-evident. I am not the cause of this. (In fact, I am contained in the cause, so to speak). The cause of this is absolute administration - Primary Orderer. What is absolute is good. (This requires some discussion of "good" if you want.) What is good is God.

1
swampB22 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s talk about “good”, I don’t want to argue the necessity of the PO not the format.

Talk about good (value) perfection and judgment.