Obviously!!! He was arguing with the other Justices not to take the Texas case. Because there would be riots. Why?
He wasn't anticipating riots just because they hear the case. Riots would only be expected if Texas WON their case. I can't see it any other way, can you???
Roberts can deny it at any time...
Because there is ZERO evidence of it.
Because there is ZERO evidence of it.
Who cares? Trump was impeached on hearsay of hearsay.
Turnabout is fair fucking play.
And the commies are winning with it.
Lol, that's right. I should have qualified as "if true". But I will now:
IF TRUE!
Granny says it true, ALWAYS listen to your granny.
yeah I think it's also possible they conspired to vote against anything trump. Why did all 3 of trumps justices give no opinion to the most important case?
That may be a good thing but we all know those states unconstitutionally changed election laws. It's a big problem and even our SCOTUS doesn't want to address it. Now what?
If I had to guess I'd say it gives them the freedom to act when/if the case comes up again.