Comments (23)
sorted by:
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
misterLahey 1 point ago +3 / -2

Her team couldn't even bother to run spell check. And she repeated every dumb ass LARP from 4chan.

1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

She did pretty well with Enron if I remember correctly.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Olds77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why'd you get downvoted simply for disagreeing? Sidney was Flynn's lawyer and exposed the judge for the corrupt piece of shit he was and Flynn chose to hire her.

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doomers gonna doom!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
ThisIsHowItStarts 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s not Sidney Powell’s fault that the court system is cucked. If you look at all the cases that have been tossed by the Supreme Court, they were based on some technicality- They haven’t even actually heard any of the cases or looked at any of the evidence on any of the cases. Go back and check it all out and maybe you will feel a little better about her. She did win the general Flynn case. Stuck by him, even with that piece of shit judge that made that string along longer than it needed to. She’s a great lawyer I just so happens that the deep state is so fucking deep we can’t even hear our cases. If they actually did we would win!

1
misterLahey 1 point ago +3 / -2

You're gonna get downvoted, but you're 100% right.

1
somedickinohio 1 point ago +2 / -1

She's another arrow in the quiver. She's brought a lot of attention to the matter, gotten cases in the courts, got a lot of people on here to talk about it. Crazy or not, she serves a purpose.

1
ForMyVeteranGrandpa 1 point ago +2 / -1

She is a strong woman who is fighting for the truth. I have respect for he. Can't say the same thing about all the doomers lurking here.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Olds77 1 point ago +2 / -1

I strongly, strongly doubt that. Flynn wouldn't have hired her if she was and she's a winner in the courtroom. I figure some of these things are exaggerations to keep the folks that rigged it on edge and ready to turn on each other as I figure the knowledge that she has she can't be open about. "Beat the grass to startle the snake".

1
BasedBoneSaw 1 point ago +2 / -1

From my understanding none of her major claims have been proven wrong and many have been proven right. Not her fault the courts are corrupt.

1
navycuda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doomer.

0
milonie 0 points ago +1 / -1

got any arguments to your assumption?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
misterLahey -1 points ago +1 / -2

LOL. No.

0
WeCax49 0 points ago +2 / -2

Her stuff has been proven correct- however, a lot of it is simply too hard to argue in favor of in a court room. We're better focused on constitutional arguments framed as such, whilst including evidence of fraud as well.

-2
GreatHumungous -2 points ago +2 / -4

Fuck off commie.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
Olds77 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why are you downvoting everyone who disagrees with you?