Forest County, Pennsylvania:
Very, very unlikely for the in person vote to be exactly equal to the calculated Total Expected Vote!
votes: 2621
tot_exp_vote: 2621
( total expected vote )
Almost certainly evidence of vote 'capping', which was much more obvious and pervasive in Michigan.
Cheaters may have missed changing the vote target for this county to something else to hide the cheat.
NY Times news feed snipit: {"fips":"42053","name":"Forest","votes":2621,"absentee_votes":0,"reporting":8,"precincts":9,"absentee_method":"Merged into voters' home precincts and released with cumulative results","eevp":100,"tot_exp_vote":2621,"eevp_value":">98%","eevp_display":">98% reported","eevp_source":"edison","turnout_stage":6,"absentee_count_progress":"all","absentee_outstanding":null,"absentee_max_ballots":302,"provisional_outstanding":null,"provisional_count_progress":null,"results":{"bidenj":715,"trumpd":1864,"jorgensenj":34,"write-ins":8},"results_absentee":{"bidenj":0,"trumpd":0,"jorgensenj":0,"write-ins":0},"last_updated":"2020-11-04T10:44:02Z","leader_margin_value":43.83823,"leader_margin_display":"R+44","leader_margin_name_display":"Trump +44","leader_party_id":"republican","margin2020":43.83823,"votes2016":2419,"margin2016":43.7,"votes2012":2312,"margin2012":21.06},
They forced the answer and messed up the process to get there.
You got it.
The Michigan data is much, much more obvious there as they either didn't get the memo from the D.N.C., or too ignorant not to run up the vote to exactly the total expected vote. Or just too busy in Detroit and forgot to go back to the smaller Trump Strong Counties and tidy up the results more.
Mountains of evidence.
We just need to shove it in the country's face day and night so that everyone understands what's about to happen.
If you look at any Chester county PA you will have found they capped all precincts and used all available votes up to 1000 away from going over available votes.
They took every mail in ballot and what I don't get is all of them requested and sent, none requested and voted by mail - fishy
Will look at. Good work.
It might be a dynamic cap tied to the current biden vote totals
I looked at every single reported state and precinct available in the US from NYT data (states and precincts time-series data), and I found some other places where there were little to no votes other than that of in-person. I am not sure if that is intentional as it relates to the fraud or not. It could very well be something else such as truly accidental errors in how those precincts report data, or foul play.
See this imgur album for my breakdown by county describing each ballot type for FL, GA, and NC (created using NYT precinct data):
https://imgur.com/a/QVIDNpc
In those graphs, look at:
Anyways, as I stated before, this might just be true unintentional messiness in NYT's processing of the data, or in the reporting of data from precincts in various counties. I'm really not sure at this moment, though I do have hunches. It's best to be cautious about our accusations unless we're absolutely sure in our analyses...we're not the left after all.
I think some of the counties in some of the states may have either misreported their results, or the hired temps. typing the results into the Edison Research system, may have been clueless.
Obviously the Lowndes County, Georgia results seem totally messed up.
The eevp (or total expected vote) is typically ~70%, at least in Michigan.
Lowndes county supposedly has 75,356 registered voters. ( source: www.valdostadailytimes.com ).
This would give an tot_exp._vote of ~52,749 votes using 70% figure.
But: tot_exp._vote listed is: 46,355
( 46,355÷75,356 = 0.6151467 =~ 61.5% )
( https://archive.is/n1UhH )
But this ambiguity and/or confusion may be exactly what the alleged voting cheaters want, as they can always fall back on the "blame the election day data entry temp."
Aren't they clever.
Who knows, as supposedly a lot of all of the Dominion systems had modems and/or internet access, supposedly to help report results.
But then again maybe they just tried to fix the election with lots of hidden vote ballot Files, swapping, etc. and minimizing the Trump vote in the small but numerous Strong Trump Counties.
Obviously the Internet connections allows someone access to the Dominion systems and potentially rig the election, and maybe leave just enough clues to cause deep resentment in the false allegedly loosing party, "best case" for them, causing a civil war in the U.S.
Good looking work, from what I can see. How can I get a good of your charts on imgur.com with a better Resolution?
I'm just saying that statistically it is very, very unlikely to have the exact in person voter tally equal to the Total Estimated Vote, especially in Michigan where's there's maybe 20 or more counties with this same problem.
Solution: audit all counties by a real hand count in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and the other 4 states in question. Even a random hand count, inspecting each paper and electronic ballot, if possible, will either indicate and verify this possible voting ballot anamoly.
Michigan votes seemingly 'capped' in Strong Trump Counties. There are many smaller counties in Michigan with the same peculiar feature of vote and total expected vote being the same.
Yet, in Wayne County ( Detroit) there is no 'cap'.
See:
( https://thedonald.win/p/11R4ggQOmZ/big-evidence-of-external-control/ )