I wish you were right but, considering all the comments already demanding that SCOTUS release transcripts and other such nonsense... I bet this only serves to increase the repeat posting.
People believe what they want, then find reasons to continue believing what they initially believed. Its very hard to admit we were wrong about something, especially if its something we wanted to believe.
From what I have heard multiple times, ALL of the justices are pretty good friends. They wouldnt shout at each other, or be shouted at. They almost always agree with each other, we just hear about the juicy cases they dont agree about. This whole story sounded like an urban legend thing the first time I heard it.
What we do know about SCOTUS is this. It takes four justices to agree to take a case and they have taken hardly any and heard none. They can also pluck a case up that is coming at them, but they rarely do and they havent now. They know we are up against a timeline and havent heard a single case yet. For them not to weigh in on this issue is almost legal malfeasance. So they have either decided to stay out of any and all election issues (easiest path for them to take but has the potential to change the makeup of the court for all time given Biden's plans to pack/rotate judges), dont like Trump (not very likely as three of them owe their careers to him and Thomas and Alito are too good of lawyers to think like this) or they are waiting for one good case to get in front of them so they can make a definitive ruling that puts the issue to rest without them actually deciding the election. It will most likely be a case brought by the Trump campaign itself. The problem is, the case will need to be both narrowly focused enough for them to feel comfortable dealing with and yet broad enough in scope to be determinative, which is kind of a catch-22 situation. It would also need to be a case about the law, as no case has yet been heard in court outlining any evidence and frankly I dont think there is time anymore. I dont know enough about the cases currently in the hopper to point to one and say that it is the one SCOTUS is looking for.
While it is definitely in their and the country's interest for them to step in, I fear they will take the path of least resistance. Fingers crossed the right case will come along and get them engaged in the fight. Best we can hope for at this point is they dont step in and rule against us.
Not too sure. I'm still skeptical of the initial story, but the SC has only been closed to the public and has remained "open for official business" since March.
I didn't think it was true in the first place, but honestly, the actual truth is even worse - to think 7 of the "justices" decided to dismiss the case independently and without any external pressure is even more depressing than just being able to blame the inexplicable decision on Scapegoat Roberts.
There are no Junior Justices. There is a Chief Justice and Associate Justices.
The Chief Justice has precisely zero authority over any other SC Justice nor any unique authority over anything at all.
But keep posting stupid as shit from Twitter and throwing a tantrum that would make a leftard envious whenever anyone tells you to think, check your source, and stop posting stupid shit.
Changes nothing, the SCOTUS are still stuffed full of feckless cucks.
They can prove it. Just release the transcript. Why in God’s name should I take their word for it?
Bruh trust me I dindu nufffin
Ill only see it 100 more times instead of a 120 times today I guess.
I wish you were right but, considering all the comments already demanding that SCOTUS release transcripts and other such nonsense... I bet this only serves to increase the repeat posting.
And... right on que- a dozen new posts demanding "proof" that Roberts didn't say stupid ass, unsourced, things in a meeting in a closed building.
This is beyond parody and well beyond stupidity.
People believe what they want, then find reasons to continue believing what they initially believed. Its very hard to admit we were wrong about something, especially if its something we wanted to believe.
From what I have heard multiple times, ALL of the justices are pretty good friends. They wouldnt shout at each other, or be shouted at. They almost always agree with each other, we just hear about the juicy cases they dont agree about. This whole story sounded like an urban legend thing the first time I heard it.
What we do know about SCOTUS is this. It takes four justices to agree to take a case and they have taken hardly any and heard none. They can also pluck a case up that is coming at them, but they rarely do and they havent now. They know we are up against a timeline and havent heard a single case yet. For them not to weigh in on this issue is almost legal malfeasance. So they have either decided to stay out of any and all election issues (easiest path for them to take but has the potential to change the makeup of the court for all time given Biden's plans to pack/rotate judges), dont like Trump (not very likely as three of them owe their careers to him and Thomas and Alito are too good of lawyers to think like this) or they are waiting for one good case to get in front of them so they can make a definitive ruling that puts the issue to rest without them actually deciding the election. It will most likely be a case brought by the Trump campaign itself. The problem is, the case will need to be both narrowly focused enough for them to feel comfortable dealing with and yet broad enough in scope to be determinative, which is kind of a catch-22 situation. It would also need to be a case about the law, as no case has yet been heard in court outlining any evidence and frankly I dont think there is time anymore. I dont know enough about the cases currently in the hopper to point to one and say that it is the one SCOTUS is looking for.
While it is definitely in their and the country's interest for them to step in, I fear they will take the path of least resistance. Fingers crossed the right case will come along and get them engaged in the fight. Best we can hope for at this point is they dont step in and rule against us.
A spokesman said.....I dont believe any of them and we all know that they are refusing to see any proof on voter fraud. 🙄
Not too sure. I'm still skeptical of the initial story, but the SC has only been closed to the public and has remained "open for official business" since March.
I didn't think it was true in the first place, but honestly, the actual truth is even worse - to think 7 of the "justices" decided to dismiss the case independently and without any external pressure is even more depressing than just being able to blame the inexplicable decision on Scapegoat Roberts.
Thank you! I was getting so tired of debunking that larp.
Unbelievable how many morons fell for this.
"I will tell you how to vote" FUCKING SERIOUSLY people?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
But Lin Wood tweeted it! So it must be true!!!
Other notes:
But keep posting stupid as shit from Twitter and throwing a tantrum that would make a leftard envious whenever anyone tells you to think, check your source, and stop posting stupid shit.
Did they debunk the statement about the riots?