I never said they were or weren’t, I was just pointing out that if the military were to get involved then the destruction or salvaging of evidence is a moot point.
I think I would even tolerate a losing court case if they would at least have the spine to hear the evidence first. Losing would suck but not even getting to make the case is so frustrating.
Losing would be worse. If they refuse to hear it, you can say you then had to do xyz because they refused to give you justice. If they hear it and you lose, the conclusion will be you acted because you "didn't like" the Supreme Court's decision.
But they are going to say that anyway. In fact they are already saying that based on SCOTUS not hearing the case. Most people just hear the case was dismissed, not that the evidence was never allowed to be presented.
I never said they were or weren’t, I was just pointing out that if the military were to get involved then the destruction or salvaging of evidence is a moot point.
I think I would even tolerate a losing court case if they would at least have the spine to hear the evidence first. Losing would suck but not even getting to make the case is so frustrating.
Losing would be worse. If they refuse to hear it, you can say you then had to do xyz because they refused to give you justice. If they hear it and you lose, the conclusion will be you acted because you "didn't like" the Supreme Court's decision.
But they are going to say that anyway. In fact they are already saying that based on SCOTUS not hearing the case. Most people just hear the case was dismissed, not that the evidence was never allowed to be presented.