18
Please give me a plausible rebuttal for why the U.S. Armed Forces would magically and collectively not follow an order from the POTUS to invoke martial law before January 20th, after they've already sacrificed several of their members to obtain Scytl data proving the election was a fraud.
posted ago by julianReyes ago by julianReyes +19 / -1

I'll wait to hear why everybody under the military legal code will somehow risk being charged for insubordination in military court, especially when military chain of command has already seen two officers get fired by Obummer for defying his orders regarding Benghazi.

"Because I scream so and arbitrary pessimism is 'realistic'" is not a valid argument.

32 comments
32 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 2 ▼
– henri_derelicte 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is not with the enlisted men and women. It’s with the officers. Don’t forget that Dem representatives and senators get to recommend people to attend West Point, the naval academy, and the Air Force Academy too. Wouldn’t be surprised if a few appointments/recommendations were politically motivated, or given out to wealthy campaign donors.

There is no debate that President Trump is commander in chief up to January 20th. The President will be well within his rights to dismiss officers for insubordination.

permalink save report block reply