I oppose all violence don't you dare ever saying that! The moment you say that, you've lost.
Let me remind you the reasoning: we have the right to do violence, but we are giving it to police and army to do it in the name of laws. Good... In that case, not a single law abiding citizen is for violence...
Until
There is no law, or the law is not applicable.
In that case, we are taking back our right to violence.
Example, home invasion, you take the gun and you give them hell.
Example, common in 3rd word countries, court declares a very guilty man non guilty, what do you do? Take what you can and give him hell.
What about the case when country as a whole stops functioning and there are no laws? Ask Syrians, Georgians, Ukrainians, Romanians, Yugoslavians...
Guess what, there is violence, a lot of it, it's called war.
Thus again: for as long as there are laws, there is no need for violence
If there are no (applicable) laws, there must be violence
I oppose all violence don't you dare ever saying that! The moment you say that, you've lost.
Let me remind you the reasoning: we have the right to do violence, but we are giving it to police and army to do it in the name of laws. Good... In that case, not a single law abiding citizen is for violence...
Until
There is no law, or the law is not applicable. In that case, we are taking back our right to violence.
Example, home invasion, you take the gun and you give them hell. Example, common in 3rd word countries, court declares a very guilty man non guilty, what do you do? Take what you can and give him hell.
What about the case when country as a whole stops functioning and there are no laws? Ask Syrians, Georgians, Ukrainians, Romanians, Yugoslavians... Guess what, there is violence, a lot of it, it's called war.
Thus again: for as long as there are laws, there is no need for violence If there are no (applicable) laws, there must be violence