2667
Comments (120)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
johnqpublic864 8 points ago +9 / -1

Exactly! I've said that, too. Washington would've defeated Caesar.

6
RejectTheProgramming 6 points ago +6 / -0

To be fair Washington had nearly 2 centuries of advancement in strategies to learn from. If you are saying Washington is more naturally gifted then I cannot say I disagree but we do have to take into account the advancement in theory and technology

8
johnqpublic864 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fair point for sure. I'm American, I'm biased. Washington would've made Dominos pizza out of Little Caesar.

7
RejectTheProgramming 7 points ago +7 / -0

Washington setting term limits shows his vision was far beyond Caeser's. People to this day are still trying to circumvent the (correct) term limit decision of Washington. One of the biggest yet least appreciated moves in history

6
johnqpublic864 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, it's just too bad they didn't set term limits for any other office, even if they deferred them. Like, say the first...say 20 years while the new nation is getting established no term limits, but then term limits take effect. I really think if they had a crystal ball, they'd have made it all even better.

4
KyleismyHero 4 points ago +4 / -0

He didn't set any term limits. Remember FDR? Read some damn history!

3
KyleismyHero 3 points ago +4 / -1

Please, Washington was an inept general. Caesar was a military genius, to compare the two is asinine. Read some damn history!

-1
johnqpublic864 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Washington was better. He was our general and the first President of the best country of the world.

Caesar ruled from the back, making cheap shitty pizzas and tossing salads for the troops. He ultimately got stabbed after the Senate got tired of mediocre pizzas all the time.