5290
posted ago by tylersfarley ago by tylersfarley +5292 / -2

Guys, this isn't some LARP. This is a classic case of a political power struggle and it has happened around the world many times. You have to show your enemies you have the power. Power is all about fear, if they have no fear of you, you lose.

Trump is showing he can call on his supporters whenever he needs them to do whatever is necessary. This is how the power struggle behind closed doors is won. People must fear Trump and the people he commands more than they fear the establishment.

Even if you can't make it on the 6th, don't question his motives. Show your full support so the message gets out. We're getting to the end game and this is not a LARP.

Comments (263)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
acasper 1 point ago +21 / -20

That’s your determination to make. I’m saying that POTUS did not call for violence.

53
fapoo 53 points ago +53 / -0

Thats fine, patriots dont need to be told when to fight or not.

7
denach644 7 points ago +7 / -0

Patriots are ready to fight if there is no option.

Be prepared.

-7
acasper -7 points ago +12 / -19

Never said they did or didn’t. Just wanted to make it clear that POTUS did not call for violence.

18
MustBeTrump 18 points ago +19 / -1

You literally did "We will not initiate combat until explicitly called for because we’re not retards."

0
acasper 0 points ago +9 / -9
  • POTUS did not call for violence.
  • POTUS has been calling rallies peaceful protests for quite awhile.
  • This is likely a show of force.
  • Show of force does not imply violence.
  • “A show of force is a military operation intended to warn or to intimidate an opponent by showcasing a capability or will to act if one is provoked.”

But to your point... “We” wasn’t intended to mean every single Patriot. I don’t presume to speak for every single Patriot. “We” is the people I do speak for. I’d like to think that group would include every Patriot who can see the amount of calls to violent action that have been taking place over the last month of which there are many fresh examples in the thread. I’m asking “You” to think critically and perform a risk assessment.

Mission:

  • Be in DC January 6th
  • Be prepared for it to be wild

Issue the warning order:

  • Done.

Make a tentative plan:

  • We’re working on that
  • Multiple plans in parallel are valid if coordinated

Start movement

Conduct reconnaissance

Complete the plan

Issue the order

Supervise and refine the plan

~

If we had a command structure this would be simple but we don’t apart from POTUS and constructive argument here to find truth. Interpretation of communications and ways to achieve mission goals is valid and should take place. I’m arguing that my “We” is not planning on initiating combat and barring a change in mission will not. We will be prepared and we will have a plan for exigencies.

4
KILLARY4PRISON 4 points ago +4 / -0

Question: if, after the 6th, the Congress certifies Joepedos electors, what would the next steps be?

0
acasper 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’d advocate for distributed and aggressive action in the form of occupation of property, withholding tax revenue, and a continuance of platform building to maintain messaging. Opposition to the above would be met with force. Secede where possible so that we don’t have to reinvent western civilization again and can focus on the matters at hand.

All of the above would be overridden by a contradictory order from POTUS or a party granted the power of his rightful position.

-4
wholesomekangz100 -4 points ago +4 / -8

Shut up faggot. Don't explicitly encourage anything, but never ever discourage anything either.

3
ProfessorRomendev 3 points ago +4 / -1

I explicitly discourage violence if Trump hasn't called for violence, and if you're not threatened.

It's called 'TheDonald.win'. He's still POTUS, he will be POTUS for 4 more years. Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero because he had INCREDIBLE trigger discipline and ONLY fired on people attack him.

Be like saint Kyle, follow the word of GEOTUS.

2
KILLARY4PRISON 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and he faces multiple murder 1 charges and had to overcome a $2M cash bail while his attacker lives free. You literally have nothing to lose.

2
acasper 2 points ago +4 / -2

No really this time. Get fucked. Spend that valuable bend over time learning how to read a comment.

0
acasper 0 points ago +1 / -1

no u shuddup. i dun agress. i protec