2848
Comments (83)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
jimboscott -1 points ago +1 / -2

I never said that.

To the contrary, I have stated many times that the cheating existed on many levels. Most likely in the very procuring of mail-in ballots (in GA).

But, historically, only a lunatic would think Trump got 105 million votes. That is simply outrageously naive and stupid.

Trump MAYBE got 2-3% more than he is credited for and Biden got 2-3% less than he is credited for. That is the limit of 'wiggle room' that the cheaters would be looking to exploit. The fact that they had to shut things down in the middle of the night in battleground states tells you that their plan was to EEK Biden over the finish line with a decent margin. None of that Third World 90% of the popular vote stupidity. Just get Biden ahead by 2-3% in swing states.

They miscalculated and had to ship in bogus ballots in PA and MI. GA... not as much so. But still they did it that way.

And that whole thing about 68% ballot error in Antrim County is being horribly misconstrued. Trump WON Antrim County easily. If he had 68% stolen from him then when those were restored, Trump would have won 110% to -10% for Biden. That's stupid.

2
Madmanmp 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole 68% wasn't misconstrued. If it was it was misconstrued by whom? And what was the error rate in GA? MI? What was the adjudication rate? The MI guy said it on TV. I dont know what all facts you git but how does you WIN only 4 major cities and less counties than your predecessors yet get 80 million votes? But after mathing... let's say 10 million votes were switched, stolen, or just discarded... whats 5%. Im just gonna go smoke some lunch. Im exhausted

0
jimboscott 0 points ago +1 / -1

The 68% was absolutely misconstrued. EVEN IN THE REPORT!

The very same sentence that stated "68.02% errors and warnings" then transitioned to "an error rate of 68.02%". That is disingenuous. A WARNING is NOT an error. I get warnings for drive space getting low, for memory getting low, for all kinds of things that are NOT errors.

THEN, the geniuses HERE take that 68.02% 'error and warning' figure and magically turn it into 68.02% BALLOTS being switched.

That is not only bullshit, it is bullshit that HARMS OUR REAL CASE.

I am your friend. I am saying we cannot fuck this up with stupid data that is being twisted and contorted into a straw man that is so easily made to burst into flames.

AIRTIGHT gets it done. This other stuff is just stupid. NOWHERE in that report was it stated what the real 'error' rate was. Errors were made synonymous with warnings. That is NOT a legitimate exercise in forensic fact finding.

2
Madmanmp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Il send the link that talks about how many adjudications happened. And just because you keep saying warning doesn't mean anything. And I not saying there was a 68% switch rate. You are conflating the 2. What was the error rate then? How many ballots were Adjudicated? Hi many ballots were reviewed. I hear you saying you're on or side. And yes air tight i optimal but what do you need in court? A reasonable doubt. You keep talking like this 68% is the nail in the coffin. The Trump team and everyone i showing inaccuracies and anomalies. Showing reasonable doubt fraud i involved. Oh and there's another video (I posted it here) showing the audit in Atrium county where they're telling the counters this isn't an investigation time, its counting time. They need the numbers. Counting blank ballots. Same signature 30 times! On film. Video evidence. Why count every ballot because its put in front of you. I believe you got a little off track and tried to ru with the 68% issue without any contributing factors. What's 5% of 80 million? 4 million. You think Joe really got 76 million votes? Only 5%. No way for Trump to get 100 million? You sure? Show me something better than Sterling (who signed off with his business email and his business gain) who is implicated Bigly and we should just trust those ballots had been there... and that there's no way Trump could've gotten 25 million more votes than he did get? 26... no way he could've gotten that from everything taken, switched, tossed, etc... I'll give you that (not really) but would you agree on possibly 90 million? Your math does add up to some degree. 5% of 155 million votes is 7.75 million but thats adding both their vote totals together. Idk.