14
posted ago by MikeWhoCheeseHairy ago by MikeWhoCheeseHairy +14 / -0

https://www.sb-tactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/SB-Tactical_Proposed-ATF-Regulations_Press-Release.pdf

this is the link for sb tactical who is the leader in pistol braces and has been the sole group pushing against the ATF to try to get a set standard for what exactly a pistol brace is. ATF has responded to the 60 day cease and desist order they gave "Live Q or Die", a manufacturer that made the "Honeybadger Pistol" which uses a SB Tactical pistol brace. The ATF intends to push forward regulation regarding what a pistol brace is by essentially saying they will do it on a case by case bases. THey are not giving any standards for what exactly a pistol brace is. This is essentially what the social media companies have been doing by not telling you in black and white terms what is against there terms of service. We need all citizens who care about our 2A rights to respond to your senators and legislatures and oppose this. SB Tactical has provided a pre filled out response in the .pdf they have posted on there website, i have included in it this post. the one click response will find your states legislatures if you provide them a zip code and it can auto send out a pre filled response to make it easy for you. We have 2 weeks to show some push back. Get at it Pedes!

This needs a sticky, hate to ask. i could care less for any upvotes, we only have 2 weeks to do as much pushback as we can

Comments (18)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
Memebomber -1 points ago +2 / -3

When the written regulations are published they will detail exactly what they are revising. The always leave a small gray area in definitions. Always. Anyone who was in the gun community and did not see this coming had their head in the ground.

“This is a pistol with a brace, not a SBR”.

Puts a pistol not a SBR to shoulder and fires in front of ATF agent.

They have said caliber, weight, and the brace being able to go past your forearm will be the major factors. The gig was up the minute they put buffer tubes and springs in “pistols”

Personally I think ATF should be a convenience store not a government agency. But I understand that isn’t the case. This isn’t the end of the world, and people should comment, but I feel the decision has been made and they are not changing their minds. People who own them will get to register them with no tax most likely and no more “pistols” that are not a SBR.

This is just an honest assessment and in no way do I endorse any form of gun control.

1
MikeWhoCheeseHairy [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Atf withdrew the notice and id like to believe it was because of the pushback from we the people

1
MikeWhoCheeseHairy [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

what makes you think they will wave the $200 tax stamp? issue with nfa registered items is you give the ATF a no reason needed excuse to enter your home armed, unless you have the registered to your business.

-1
Memebomber -1 points ago +1 / -2

They stated it already.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1