1348
Comments (52)
sorted by:
99
Marshall2 99 points ago +99 / -0

If SCOTUS gave a damned about the Constitution, it wouldn't have been rejected the first time. They are proceduralists like the ancient Pharisees who managed minutia about the Law, but Ignored it's basic premise.

48
deleted 48 points ago +48 / -0
25
YugiohVrains 25 points ago +26 / -1

He's raped something of actual value this time.

5
AnomalusCitizen7375 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now THAT's spicy!

12
RahkeemTheMachine 12 points ago +12 / -0

Institutions exist to protect themselves. That’s it

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
15
CrimsonClown 15 points ago +15 / -0

You know how you can tell the DNC is owned by China? Not only do they not represent any American values but they represent China’s core philosophy. It doesn’t matter how you win, so long as you win in the end - even if it means cheating.

4
TerraHertz 4 points ago +4 / -0

A core philosophy of lying, cheating and stealing, of never ever admitting fault, and absolutely believing everyone outside their own group/party/cult are worthless and not really even people, thus best enslaved or killed?

The CCP yes, communists in general yes.. .but let's not forget another bunch of clowns with a long history of the same behavior.

For some reason it's quite hard to tell the difference between communists and those other clowns. Apart from fashions in hats and hairstyles.

5
Hades440 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you really want to know what would happen, do everything exactly like this election, but put an R next to the cheaters name instead of a D and you'll see real quick how they deal with it.

11
DrCowboyPresident 11 points ago +13 / -2

They are proceduralists like the ancient Pharisees who managed minutia about the Law, but Ignored it's basic premise.

Kinda like their modern day descendants who aren't supposed to carry items from their home and public spaces on the Sabbath, but outsmart their God by hanging a fishing line around the city and saying everything inside the line is technically home?

And don't even get me started on the KosherSwitch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdbkvJznmwU

2
Prussian_Pepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Modern translation of the "Pharisee" class = Rabbi (for those that don't know). 2000 years later still playing the same game. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

but outsmart their God by hanging a fishing line around the city and saying everything inside the line is technically home?

I would disagree only to say for most of them their "god" is actually MONEY. They kind of had that problem of whoring themselves out to every other culture since ancient BC times. And every single one of the judges and prophets had to remind them of their faults. (Deuteronomy 31:24-29, the Levites, were the clan of priests, eventually became Pharisees - Rabbis ect. Moses himself is saying the book of law should be placed in the ark to bear witness AGAINST THEM, because they specifically are rebellious and stiff necked. They have ALWAYS thought they could outsmart God with their sleight of hand tricks)

1
Random_Aussie 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, that describes most humans... we just have a particularly detailed record in this case.

1
DrCowboyPresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Different cultures evolve and emphasize certain things more than others

29
EdisonHwy 29 points ago +29 / -0

The clock is ticking.

Time to get moving if this really has legs.

27
becky21k1 27 points ago +27 / -0

Right, SCOTUS will just agree to hear it in like June

2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dont put it past them to rule against it for a myriad of primarily chinese communist and pedophilia related reasons

26
Cmdrpaul 26 points ago +26 / -0

Guys , lawyer here. Every case filed in federal courts in the country is under Article 3 of the constitution. They can still be rejected.

13
SellTheSun 13 points ago +13 / -0

Exactly this. Article 3 is what allowed Texas to file their case directly with SCOTUS the first time, and SCOTUS said "fuck the Constitution" , shirked their original jurisdiction constitutional obligation, and refused to hear the case. It marked the death of the supreme court IMO, if they don't respect the Constitution than no one will.

3
ChocolateEvryday 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. I was very confused for a moment.

20
JasonK 20 points ago +21 / -1

The Texas case then should also involve the ballots in California and now that they will have standing they can easily threaten SCOTUS with secession.

17
Nomad1 17 points ago +17 / -0

SCOTUS IS NOT A COEQUAL BRANCH OF GOVT! IT IS SUBORDINATE TO THE LEGISLATURE AND EXECUTIVE! SINCE WW2 THE SCOTUS AS COEQUAL HAS BEEN PUSHED AND IS NOW TAKEN AS FACT! IT IS NOT!

https://youtu.be/MYFYflRec70

9
TheFaithful 9 points ago +9 / -0

Pressure is important guys. This helps us. It adds to that pressure, right alongside our marching orders for the 6th, and the millions that will be showing up in DC. This is us, no, this is Americans putting pressure on every single wing of our government from every angle to do the right thing, or we will make the decision for them. They don't get to decide "what's best" for America, they will uphold the law. This alone wouldn't be much to bet on, but alongside DC, it may get through. Either way, we will not let them ignore the Constitution.

5
tiredofwinning2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey ACB, the left thinks you’re racist because you had the heart to adopt a black child. Do the right thing for gods sake and stand up for your country and for the people who believe in the constitution and the great people of this country.

4
Two_Scoops__ 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just started following Simon. Can anyone here vouch for his reliability? What has he predicted in the past that came true?

4
colonial113 4 points ago +4 / -0

He is a guy who is selling USB sticks that "shields" you from 5G waves on his website. That was enough for me.

1
Two_Scoops__ 1 point ago +1 / -0

can't tell if being sarcastic or not...

2
2
Two_Scoops__ 2 points ago +2 / -0

wait so are you saying you agree with this or think it's bullshit?

2
colonial113 2 points ago +2 / -0

His angle is a kind of new age awakening in the spiritual sense, as he just said in his recent video, the Earth ascending to the 5th dimension. He is looking at the events in the US as part of this awakening, and is the reason why he is extensively covering it. Even if his mother and grandfather was MI6/CIA, I don't think he has access to current real intel level info. Pretty sure he is foraging boards like 4chan, ats and such and picks the larps that fit his narrative. Seems to be a real nice guy though.

2
FORMERCHILDSTAR 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like everything else, take it with a grain of salt. He seems honest, and well reasoned. He's one more voice. I think he tends to keep his analysis within the realm of possibility because he bases it off official sources and he keeps it tethered to the constitution. We'll see.

1
Two_Scoops__ 1 point ago +1 / -0

official sources? Have you watched his videos? He definitely drops "intel" that isn't out there yet

2
FORMERCHILDSTAR 2 points ago +2 / -0

But isn't it Intel from official sources? Simon never goes rogue. He's ahead of the game in many instances, but not making stuff up.

1
Two_Scoops__ 1 point ago +1 / -0

ohhh i read your comment as like "msm" or whatever. Yeah he says he only drops intel when he has permission to. Have you been following him for awhile? Do you think he's trustworthy?

2
FORMERCHILDSTAR 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, no...the MSM can go die. I have not been following him for too long, but he seems logical and well reasoned...not looking for clicks or attention. He's another source of info, but I try to not jump to conclusions about all the information I'm taking in. I'm sure lots of things we are not aware of are happening behind the scenes too. Merry Christmas!

3
skitchinwrholder 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's literally what they did last time and it got rejected.

3
Shadilady 3 points ago +4 / -1

Do it!!!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
sully 5 points ago +5 / -0

Needs only 4 Justices to vote to hear a case.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
FORMERCHILDSTAR 2 points ago +2 / -0

If illegal aliens have standing, then sure as fuck millions of disenfranchised USA citizen voters have standing. Thus is infuriating.

2
shaven_llama 2 points ago +3 / -1

LOL, they’ll find a way to dismiss this one too. Good on the lawyers for trying, but it’s not going to work with a thoroughly corrupt judiciary.

1
cannon152 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem is they will probably wait until after the election to hear it. Source Chief Cuck Roberts

1
kennedyc5217 1 point ago +1 / -0

The constitution has no standing standing, next!!

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they need to refile it and cite a different part of the constitution? Shouldnt scotus know the constitution already, and know what powers and obligations they have without having to be reminded?

1
Mr_Sheets 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lord God, In Jesus' name I pray.

Please forgive my sins as I know that I am wretched. But through your spirit you guide me on my path and strengthen me.

I pray that the information from Simon Parkes that I just viewed in the YouTube video is true. This country was a gift from You and darkness has crept in secretly, even those who were long ago written about for this condemnation: ungodly men, turning Your grace into indecency, and denying our only master, You, and Lord, Jesus Christ.

In Jesus' name, AMEN

1
peakspike 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is Simon Parkes just another Larper or maybe a controlled opposition person trying to instill false hope into patriots? Why would he have "inside sources"? Some guy over in the UK.

1
REDPILLEDBYALEXJONES 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the plan if the Supreme Court doesn't act

1
isitpedanticenough 1 point ago +1 / -0

(Simon Parkes, a highly reliable source)

(according to u/47thSage)

Welp, that's all I need is an anonymous internet guy's vouching for an anonymous source.

1
Random_Aussie 1 point ago +1 / -0

That word... I do not think it means what you think it means.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
fadelio 1 point ago +1 / -0

"highly credible"