740
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
CloakAndDagger 8 points ago +9 / -1

*Clintons

"Clinton's" means it belongs to Clinton.

-1
Judiwont -1 points ago +4 / -5

Do you feel smart when you point out other’s mistakes?

7
CloakAndDagger 7 points ago +9 / -2

*Others' mistakes. The apostrophe goes after the plural "s" if you are talking about more people.

I don't do it to disparage the other person, I do it to help them write more correctly next time. If someone fell on the street and I helped him up, you're the type of person that would accuse me of feelings of superiority. Why so cynical?

And also, being a patriot means you not only love your homeland but also respect your language. Sloppiness is not a virtue.

2
Nancypelosisoldliver 2 points ago +3 / -1

In my personal opinion as an English and only english speaker.of my entire 22 years on earth, English is even more complex than even english speakers think often times and mastering it pays dividends.

You probably know this already but for example, the nazi part of the nazi party stood for "national socialist german workers party" and knowing grammer means the difference between figuring out that the nazis were for Nationwide socialism, not "right wing nationalism" like the left thinks.

And usually "workers party" is what communists call their party historically. Hitler when he first got in went around and did his socialism by fixing up factories and things. like most socialist communist governments, the "free" money they steal from their own citizens to pay for those things runs out and the real problems start. They fix those problems with gulags, concentration camps, and furnaces. Of course, that only makes it worse!

Adolf hitler would be so proud of todays democrat party. Yet the dems refuse to believe it no matter how much we explain it to them. All because cnn abc cbs fox the fbi and the cia, corporations, and morons tell them otherwise.

1
TalmudIsToiletPaper 1 point ago +3 / -2

This may be one of the worst historical analysis bits I've ever read. You get the Smooth Brain Award for today, so congratulations. There are entire Economics Courses at the Undergraduate, and Graduate Levels which examine NatSoc German Economics as a system, evaluating the Pros and Cons, and comparing and contrasting with Communism, Socialism, and Capitalism.

Endeavor to ascertain if you can find some of the required texts for the Courses, read them, then write us a report, debooking your own current understandings. It's still called in Economics Circles "The German Miracle", and it was nothing like you just described. It was an unprecedented explosion of growth, because the Reichsmark was directly pegged to the German GDP. Meaning, if the average worker put in an extra 5 hours each week, not only was that worker paid for the extra hours, but the money he was paid in each successive week was worth more, due to increased National Production. The money that worker had in savings, was actually also worth more a month later, not because of Interest, but the increased strength of the Reichsmark.

The economic structure tremendously incentivized the populace to work harder, which created a much higher standard of living across the Country, as opposed to the very disparate economic conditions, and the horror shows of Weimar, and previously Imperial Dynastic Rule. The German Workers Unions became the models for many European Countries, and their Union Workers still have a tremendously high quality of life today.

Also, your German is shit. It's "Nationalist Socialist German Workers Party", commonly stated as National Socialist Workers Party with the lacking common English Translation. They were Nationalists, and Socialists, putting the interests of Germany First, as a State for Ethnic Germans. Sound familiar in part?? That's because Trumpism is also Economic Nationalism, but without the Socialist and Racialist aspects of the NSDAP. Private Industry and Business Ownership were highly encouraged under the NSDAP, which is the opposite of Communism, wherein The State owns the means of production.

That's not an advocacy for their system, but if you're going to formulate a criticism, you have to start with an accurate understanding of what it is you're attempting to critique.

Your English and grammar are also both terrible as well, for it supposedly being your first language. Do some homework man.